Quote:
Originally Posted by ace
The innuendo is LaRouche killed Duggan.
Why would LaRouche do this? For what purpose?
I've read Duggan's blog and it doesn't make any sense at all.
LaRouche had a Jewish supporter murdered while he was at a conference in Germany? Why?
Just saying that a few times out loud sounds like Dennis King's wet dream come to life.
If you're not saying LaRouche had someone murdered what are you saying?
|
Well, Ace, I see you're new here, so maybe you haven't read a single previous post (although somehow I doubt that.....)
Number 1: Jeremiah's phone call to his mother suggests he was far from being a "supporter" of LaRouche. Also, the traitor and spy line that we have all heard now doesn't sound like "supporter" to me.
Number 2: Don't recall anyone saying that LaRouche ordered Jeremiah's murder. If you've got a quote to that effect, please produce.
Number 3: As even the meanest intellect should be able to see, what is being said is that there are a number of mysterious circumstances and discrepancies surrounding Jeremiah's death; that the official story is idiotic because impossible to prove (and the police often go in for proof, although apparently not in this part of Germany); and that it would be good to have an investigation into these factors
because no investigation has yet occurred.
Number 4: As Earnest One indicated in his reference to the Purloined Letter (or, just to irritate any Sherlock Holmes haters out there, the dog that didn't bark), most curious and interesting of all in the past seven years has been the
behavior of LaRouche and the LaRouche org, trolls and all, in connection with the death of Jeremiah Duggan.
So I guess what I'm saying, Champ--sorry, Ace--is that the behavior of LaRouche et al., the vast quantity of mean-spirited hogwash emitted therefrom--is the thing that raises the greatest number of suspicions.
And that's what it's all about
: Suspicion.
Because, you see, we don't
know what happened.
The only people who seem to
know what happened are the LaRouche groupies, which is odd because, you see, they also
don't know anything about it at all.
It's a fine line, and Lyn isn't walking it too well--to say at one and the same time that it's Jeremiah's fault, Erica's fault, and Tony Blair's fault, that it's definitely suicide, based on information and belief--and to say at the same time "Who, me? Why, I don't know a thing about it. Jeremy Who?"
Reactive hysteria is not always the best strategy, no matter what Lyn thinks.
The longer it goes on, and the more fake "Golly gee" posts about it, the worse it gets. Know what I mean?