[chator]

Originally Posted by xlcr4life

Didn't Lyn predict a complete collapse in January?

Anyone have a review of the latest groundbreaking webcast?

xlcr4life@hotmail.com

This will be rather brief. I will just focus on those elements of the speech that deal with the stated topic of the speech, The End of the Obama Administration. LaRouche starts off explaining where we're headed and why. "We are headed, right now, into a dark age; without some very radical changes in policy, the planet will go into several generations of a dark age, in which the plans are, on the British side, and similar sides, to reduce the world's population from approximately 6.7 billion people today, to an early arrival at less than 2. That is what's behind the policy of the British, that's what's behind the European policy, that's what's behind the policy of Obama, who is nothing but a British puppet—as I warned you on the 11th of April last year, that this man is a British puppet. He's not really a loyal American in any functional sense. He's a puppet of a foreign, enemy power."

Then he draws a comparison of Obama to Emperor Nero, "He's not particularly intelligent. He's like the Emperor Nero. And if you think of what I said about him, on the 11th of April last year, and described him as a Nero, and think very carefully of what he's done as policymaking, and the way he has reacted to crises, since April 11th of last year to the present time, you know, and are warned, that what you have on your hands is a virtual copy of the Emperor Nero. The real-life Nero of that time sexually assaulted his mother and then killed her; and took his best friend, and it took him four times to successfully kill his best friend. He said the same thing that Obama has said recently, that he's too good for the American people, as Nero said he's too good for the people of Rome." Then he makes a political prediction, "This Obama is finished. He has not been removed, but his utility, his survival in the Presidency, is very short."

Then, he makes what might be considered a controversial statement, if it were to be taken seriously. No chance of that, this is LaRouche talking, "But in any case, as long as this man controls the United States, there's no chance of the United States continuing to exist, or much of anything."

Then he offers a political analysis of what's happening inside the United States, "Americans don't hate Obama very much: They despise him. Because they don't think he's really responsible. They're willing to accept the fact that they've got a President who is a pig, or whatever Obama really is; they're willing to admit that. But what they hate—you know, you hate the member of your family who's gone against you, more than you hate the outsider. Obama, for the American population generally, is an outsider. He can't betray you, because he never was part of you. The hatred of the American citizen, by and large, is directed against the members of Congress, who support Obama! You saw that clearly in the Massachusetts vote, recently, on the replacement of the deceased Senator Kennedy. The hatred of the people out there is against the members of Congress who support Obama. They hate what they consider their friends, their representatives, who have betrayed them to the enemy, to the outsider Obama! This process has taken the form of a mass strike, which became clear in August of last year. People came out, at these town hall meetings, so-called, they came out in masses, and they said to the members of Congress, "Shut up! We want to tell you something, you stupid jerk! You betrayed us! You're supporting policies that would kill us! We don't like you any more! But we want you do the right thing, for a change." The people are no longer thinking of screaming at the guys who are supposed to represent them, and saying, "Now, do the right thing." They're saying, "We want you out!" They want the elected members of Congress to disappear! Especially, the Democratic members of the Congress, they want them gone! They look at the members of the Congress as either criminals, or stinking cowards—weaklings, foolish weaklings. They hate them! And you see that they're dropping like flies. They still are voting for Obama on this and that piece of legislation, but the people out there, hate them." In Sum, the American people hate Congress for supporting Obama, who is an outsider, or foreign enemy, or whatever. This analysis doesn't really explain why Obama was overwhelmingly voted into office a little more than a year ago. But it does play up to the hopes the cult candidates have of being able to capture a seat in Congress, the mass strike will help them get elected.

Then he explains how Obama will be removed from office, he and his organization will make it happen! "We must have Obama removed from the Presidency. We don't have to remove everybody in the Presidential team; we just simply take out Obama, and those people who are prototypes, the so-called behaviorists. We have to get rid of Bernanke. We have to get rid of Geithner. You have to get rid of all these people of the team—you have to get Rahm Emanuel out of there, get his brother out of medicine before he kills more people, and so forth. You have to take that particular element, inside the Presidential institutions, and get rid of them. Go! Scat!"

That's all he really says that relates to the stated topic, everything else is memory relapses into the past, a recount of history through a LaRouchican perspective, and a rehash of current proposals the organization wants on the table; the 4-power agreement, nuclear power, space exploration, bankruptcy reorganization, a credit system, putting people to work at productive jobs, etc.

So there you have it, the survival of the United States depends on Obama's early retirement, asassination, or impeachment. Quite a task he's given his organiztion, Get rid of the constitutional elected President, or you, your family, and country won't live much longer!

It's funny LaRouche didn't make the slightest mention of his failed January surprise prediction of a total collapse of everything. You would think if he took his own predictions seriously, he would be trying to explain why things didn't exactly pan out as he'd indicated. I guess one of the fringe benefits of being a cult leader is not having to be accountable to anyone for the things you say. I'm guessing the January surprise prediction was just a cheap parlor trick to get people to come back from their families following the holidays, or to prevent them from being tempted to leave the organization during the time the cult has to worry the most about members leaving. The LPAC cult candidates is another example of a parlor trick or scam to keep people interested and working for the organization. Except this one is aimed at the younger members, and supporters outside the organization. This too is another phantasm, that won't go anywhere.