Speaking of Dennis King's website and its posting concerning LaRouche's latest rant against Jeremiah Duggan and his family http://lyndonlarouchewatch.org/larouche-google-news.pdf--
I think it's useful to reprint in full that "press release"—principally to give a flavor of Lyn's viciousness and industrial-strength dishonesty, and secondarily to convey exactly how Alz the old heimer has gotten. While you're working on decoding the syntax, I'll be counting up the number of times he uses the word "relevant."
A Crucial Slant on the David Kelly Case
By Lyndon H. LaRouche, Jr.
Jan. 28 (EIRNS)—So far, the British parties involved in the somewhat celebrated affair of suspected links between both the deaths of Dr. David Kelly and what has been fraudulently represented as the alleged non-suicide of Jeremiah Duggan, have failed to disclose crucially
relevant facts respecting the subject's, Jeremiah Duggan's,
relevant mental health history since childhood until his suicide in the vicinity of Wiesbaden, Germany.
The British circles have curiously failed to take into account statements reportedly made by Jeremiah himself shortly before his suicide, to the effect that he was having difficulty in securing some medication essential to his mental stability. Even without such information, the facts of the manner of Duggan's death, strongly indicate a mental health problem. Where is the
relevant British investigation of the matter of the suicide of Jeremiah Duggan? What of such
relevant facts as his reported statements regarding past emotional disturbances dating from his childhood, and indicating a role of the London Tavistock Clinic at some point in this case? Are there not additional areas of investigation of Jeremiah's mental health status absolutely required for judgment in a case in which
relevant eyewitnesses have presented reported facts confirming three separate acts of attempted suicide, in quickly repeated succession?
Since the core of the utterances from British sources have stubbornly asserted falsified facts on
relevant matters in the case, facts repeatedly shown to have been false to established facts, is there not a clear and strong suggestion that there is a connection between the dubious finding of suicide in the case of Dr. David Kelly, and the fraudulent denial of well-documented eyewitness evidence of the actually suicide of Jeremiah? Is not my appearance twice on the BBC broadcasts in the matter of Prime Minister Tony Blair's lying pretext for launching war against Iraq, as this fact of the matter was emphasized by Dr. Kelly, the primary area of fact bearing on Erica Duggan's launching what has been a largely fraudulent campaign against me, launched by important associates of Blair in the setting of the death of Dr. Kelly, of the highest
relevance in the behavior of certain British circles in the strange role of Erica Duggan?
If that evidence respecting such highly
relevant matters as the strongly implied mental health problems of Jeremiah Duggan, is not supplied by the
relevant British sources, then, in light of already clearly established facts, is it not clear that the political motives of those British interests pushing the denial of Jeremiah's suicide, must be called into question in this matter, especially in any case, such as the case of the Duggan suicide, in which the issue of the lying by former Prime Minister Tony Blair, on the subject of launching a war against Iraq, is the crucial setting of the crafting of what has already been shown to have been a politically motivated, fraudulent allegation?
What It Means
In this brief release, LaRouche manages to hurl more vitriol at Jeremiah Duggan and his mother Erica than normal people could credit.
The constant mutterings about Jeremiah's "strongly implied mental health problems" are slanderous and libelous. What possesses LaRouche to say, and then repeat in print, so many falsehoods about so many people?
Here, of course, the reason is obvious: LaRouche is terrified that Erica Duggan's recent success in court in Britain will reopen the case of Jeremiah Duggan's death--something which could have vast consequences for LaRouche and his organization.
We know LaRouche has lawyers--one thing he can always afford, as has been demonstrated again recently in a Kronberg case hearing, where Lyn et al. were represented by a phalanx of lawyers.
All the more strange, then (given that he has lawyers), that he should actually print something like this: "Even without such information, the facts of the manner of Duggan's death, strongly indicate a mental health problem."
In other words, even if everything LaRouche has said about Jeremiah's "mental health problems" is untrue--the details concerning the circumstances of his death show that he had such a problem.
But wait! The "facts of the manner of Duggan's death" are precisely what's at issue. Is LaRouche saying he knows what those facts are?
This has always been the central conundrum: The organization has insisted that it had nothing to do with Jeremiah's death, but has mobilized internationally--frantically--to prevent a reopening of the case. The obvious question is: why such a frenzy?
The organization has veered between denying knowledge of the circumstances of Duggan's death, on the one hand, and on the other, insisting it was suicide. Again, if the organization had nothing to do with it: why insist it was suicide?
How do they know?
Who are these "eyewitnesses" LaRouche refers to who "have presented reported facts confirming three separate acts of attempted suicide, in quickly repeated succession"?
If someone tried to commit suicide—three times—in front of you, wouldn’t you act to stop it?
And what is LaRouche talking about when he writes, "Where is the relevant British investigation of the matter of the suicide of Jeremiah Duggan?"?
What he sees looming ahead of him is precisely the relevant British investigation into the death of Jeremiah Duggan, and the reason for that investigation is that the responsible authorities are dissatisfied with the conclusion of suicide.
Now they wish to ascertain how, in fact, he died.
As for the David Kelly red herring? This is typical of the LaRouche fog machine--David Kelly and Jeremiah Duggan both died in 2003. Both were British. Both were officially said to have committed suicide. Therefore, obviously, to the mind of an unwell man, they must be connected.
As for the details of the "connection"? Wheels within wheels.