The Mass Strike Strikes Again!
 

The line coming from LPAC regarding Scott Brown's victory last week is that the "mass strike" defeated Obama's candidate (Martha Coakley) in Massachusettes. By "mass strike", they don't mean what Rosa Luxemburg meant when she used the term, instead they mean an imaginary, spontaneous (translation: Doesn't require organizing), popular uprising that defeats LaRouche's enemies, and brings LYM "magically" to the threshold of political power. If only such a thing existed LaRouche would have been President long ago, like in that Sliders episode where LaRouche suceeds J.Edgar Hoover as President of the United States. By "defeated Obama's candidate" they mean that Martha Coakley, the Democratic candidate running for Ted Kennedy's seat, wasn't defeated, rather it was Obama and his Hitlerian program that was defeated. In other words, a stronger Democratic candidate defeating Scott Brown would have been an impossibility. While some news agencies have given credence to the notion that anger played a role in Martha Coakley's defeat, http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com...-senate-upset/ That anger seems to have come from an unlikely source. Though some news agencies overplayed the role of the "tea Party" movement in Coakley's defeat, polling very clearly indicates that Brown wasn't elected by a fringe section of the Republican party (which only makes up 15% of registered voters in the state). He was elected largely by independents, http://www.csmonitor.com/USA/Politic...pendent-voters, and secondly, by Democrats (22%), http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/po...-81999072.html Including many Democrats and independents who voted for Obama a little over a year ago. In other words, Brown was elected by former Obama voters who feel betrayed by the President and the Democratic Party. In what way they feel betrayed and why is a good question, and it most likely has something to do with some of the issues LPAC has been bringing up as causes for voter anger, like the economy, healthcare, the bailout of the banks, and the war in afghanistan. But the question remains, how many Scott Brown voters believed they were defeating Hitler's program? Probably none, or very few. And it remains to be seen how many Scott Brown voters will turn out to elect LaRouche's Brown. Following LPAC logic, if, in fact, Scott Brown was elected by the "mass strike", isn't it logical to think they will turn out and elect Rachel Brown to the U.S. House of Representatives? Doesn't she represent an opposition to everything voters are angry at, as well as, a solution to those very problems that are making voters angry? It's interesting to re-watch this video of LaRouchies carpetbagging a Scott Brown rally, http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ta6Oj7SgMXg Even the Brown supporters are uncomfortable with the Obama-Hitler poster, and clearly regard the LaRouchies as an unwelcome presence and nuisance. Rather than leading the "mass strike", it appears the LaRouchies are clearly tailing it.

Bueso
 

While Obama is Hitler, Germans are of course victims of "Crimes against Humanity" - at least according to Bueso. They have a new video online for the elections in Northrine-Westphalia: "The Dismantling of Northrine-Westfalia - A Crime against Humanity". For those of you unlucky enough to understand German, watch it here:

http://bueso.de/

The contrast between the LYM "candidate"'s Polish name and accent and her teutonic nationalist drivel about "High tech made in Germany" and the "People of Poets and Thinkers" is also quite funny - probably won't work so well for the intended audience. She also goes on calling for "Glass-Steagall" laws and a "Pecora Commission" without further explaining what these are - as few Germans will have heard about them.

Chator. here is how the elections work. In the 1980s we ran hundreds of candidates across the board via our Dem front group "NDPC". Let me explain how the cheap parlor trick works . In many races there would ne no candidate of a district that was retruning a long time Dem or GOP candidate bakc to office for decades. The primary electiuon would often be the only election worth paying attention to. We would run candidates who could garner an easy 10 to 15 % protest vote the sawm way any body else would get with just having thier name on the ballot. To the members who are in an insular world, they would believe that the vote meant that a massive outouring of support was for Lyn and we could win elections and Lyn would win the Presidency. Having the name of Brown is also a plus if the cult wishes to gather some protest votes against Barney Frank.



I was always amused by listening to some of our local members who were running who actually believed that they would be upsetting a 6 term official in the primary . The 20 % vote, if tha tmuch would then makes its way to the briefing and phone teams to show how the country is gung ho for Lyn and if they only lent us their entire life savings, we would have won.





PatentrezeptI seriously doubt that most members have any clues about what they are spouting as this is just part of being in the insular world of the cult. What is always funny is to read encounters between people in the real world who know something about a subject and the cult. The usuall post is that they would see a LYMster on campus using big words to impress a naive student and then they would question them. It always end with the LYMster calling the person a fascist or some other insult, sorta of like how "laroucheisright does.



To the members, being able to recite something from Lyn without actually having to known it is very easy when there are no consequences for being a fool. After all, your only correcting mechanism is either a fellow serf of the local leader. I very vividy recall a moment in the office when the NC got off of the phone with the NEC conference call and called the phone team together. "The bond market just collapsed, proving that Lyn is right about the collapse and we need to raise more money".



I was getting ready to get out of this asylum and was viewing this as someone who goofily thought that I joined something which was supposed to be run by master economists instead of the fools in front of me. The yields in certain bonds went down at the same time that junk bond interest rates were rising to attract buyers. Investors were putting their money into stocks as CD rates were declining. The past year we had pretty good yields on bond funds as people exited stocks. EIR was being sold as an economics Bible instead of the worthless crap it was. Maybe you had some spook news and a few tidbits from making thousands of calls each day around the world, but this was a massive delusion with the Larouche-Rieman forecasting machine as the lead item where no one could actually tell what it is!



Nothing has changed over the decades as the hook for the members is that they too can be as smart as Lyn by knowing some names and talking jibberish non stop while someone else nods in aggreement. You can skip years and years of studying and school and lead the world wide takeover for Lyn by being able to say something with a new word attached or with a picture of whomever is the new enemy as Hitler. Do this at a card table shrine or chained like veal to a boiler room for three or four decades and you pretty much sum up your life in the LC/LYM.



Take a look at this site to see an example of how this cheap parlor trick works on the naive.



http://74.125.47.132/search?q=cache:...&ct=clnk&gl=us



The LYM member asks a question to Lyn about "Energy Flux Density" and see how the answer becomes Larouchefied into cultism where you do not need to study the history of Physics or Maxwell or others or magnetic fields etc. If you do, according to Lyn, you are damaged like all of those people out there who call your cult bluffs daily.



Everything becomes cult contaminated by Lyn and the result is that whatever a member may know which is correct, will be tinged by the lunacy. Read about how Lyn talks about energy flux density and why you must have nuclear power, or the human race perishes. The issue is not the nuclear power plant, but the apacolyptic lunacy so that IF you do not support nuclear power, then you are an enemy of the human race and a 100 times worse then Hitler. What Lyn is writing is nonsense since the final product of the power source is the electricity to be sent somewhere. When you flip a switch, the source is immaterial as along as the voltage, supply and current is up to your needs. I work with equipment that takes current from the local utility and uses transformers to up the voltage by thousands of times to do what it has to do. The machinery does not care if the source was oil, gas, coal, solar, hydro, wind or nuclear as long as it is constant and priced correctly.



We read this idiot (Lyn) now blabbing about natural gas as a lowered ordered chemical source of power being inferior to a nuclear generated KW. You can take the gas and us it in a fuel cell and that changes the efficiency. Instead of using real world physics and math Lyn tells the cult to ignore what the real world works by dollars and cents and to use 'Higher orders of Power"! The essence of being in the cult is to be like Lyn where you flunk out of every subject and substitute "hidden and secret knowlege" of the elites, which only Lyn has the mastery of.



This is cult 101 over the centuries.



Now we find that Lyn tells this sap in the LYM that you can only mass desalinate with a nuclear power plant because of the energy flux denity. WTF, there are over 25,000 desalination plants world wide. You can go on GE's web site and order the biggest desalination plant you want. About a dozen or more nuclear power plants are used in Japan, India and Russia for this. But wait a minute, what is used is the heated water used for cooling which can be then used in different desalination equipment.



The largest plant in the world I think is in Saudi Arabie and is gas fired. These are hybrid systems being developed with the invention of reverse osmosis filtering and tinier membrane filtering. The next leap in desalination is with nano tube technology. The USA has a big plants in Tampa and San Diego, both using the cooling water from conventional fired plants. Do you think Lyn has a clue as to what to do with the brine discharge and how it has to be treated before being released? All of this is just for the consumption by the members or this Larouche Jabroni who will not question the mish mash and ooh and ahhh over the cheap parlor trick on the naive.



Easy answers for easy minds.



larouche Palooza 2010!



-Here we find something silly in the son of Ronald Regan, Ron Reagan being asked about the Hitler signs at Tea Party rallies! If only he had a clue as to how many dirty tricks we did to try to impress him.



http://www.businessandmedia.org/arti...127143438.aspx




-Justice works slowly at times as we have some Duggan coverage here. Gee, why does the cult tell the LYMsters that the media is not covering Lyn when this paper has asked for an interview for 7 years?



http://www.hamhigh.co.uk/content/cam...A39%3A00%3A827



http://www.times-series.co.uk/news/4...o_son_s_death/





-Glen M checks in .

http://www.minnesota912.com/blog/?p=98



-Lyn gets a small mention here in a book review.

http://www.theworldismycountry.org/a...iberal-fascism




-Anger at the cult's stinkbombing of the Tea Party?

http://boards.insessiontrials.com/sh...php?p=13826941





-Somewhere in this Scientology thread is our cult.


http://forums.whyweprotest.net/15-me...rged-60161/69/




-The death of Howard Zinn brings on some mentions of Lyn for descriptive purposes.

http://deanesmay.com/2010/01/28/howard-zinn-rip/





-People are funny. Here the talk is about FDR.

http://reason.com/blog/2010/01/28/fd...s-dont-apply-t



-The web allows any one to look into the cult and Lyn and do their own reports.

http://davefromqueens2.blogspot.com/...man-being.html



-Now Harley is from the "Larouche Foundation"? Is Lyn ready to kick the bucket?

http://labvirus.wordpress.com/2010/0...eagle-md-aaem/



-The true impact of the cult to most people.

http://forums.penny-arcade.com/showt...php?p=13380624





-Here is an election where Lyn WON!

http://www.nachtkabarett.com/babalon...r-/post:113167



-More Mass Strike victories at Safeway card table shrines.

http://www.myballard.com/forum/topic.php?id=3637



-Same thing buried in here.



http://forums.penny-arcade.com/showt...php?p=13380226


-Here we have some real delusions by a Larouche Jabroni at God Like. In the Kooky world of Larouche, there is no knowledge of the dozens of high speed rail advocates, mass transit advocates, lobbbying by the industry, TRAINS magazine or the thousands of media articles about high speed rail for the USA. For the people who are or will be studying how intensive cults can be, this is a clinical winner for your research.



http://www.godlikeproductions.com/fo...sage976210/pg1



-This appeared in a forum.


http://www.plime.com/l/138277-related/1/


prompting this.


The fun part is that we see how the cult cracks open a bottle of Connecto to try to win some money for the targeted demographic. The funnier part is knowing that poor Don Phau who was on TV for this and mocked endlessly by the gamer community was once a big shot in the LC and went to prison for Lyn with a smile. He does not play video games with some kids because ......well, the ex wife had the good sense to leave this lunacy . After three or four decades of loyal work for Lyn including prison, Don should have a lot to say about how Lyn took care of his health care last year. if you want to see a real victim of the cult and how Lyn can ruin your prime years and take away your life, just think of Don. You should have listened to that Beatles song "All you need is Love" instead of Lyn's version of "All you need is hate" son. It is truly sad to see what has happened to Don and how so much of his life has been expended in keeping a mad man happy who took, took and then discarded what was left.


-NJ Larouche Jabroni.

http://blog.nj.com/njv_publicblog/20...ma_played.html


-Now here is a first. We find Lyn mentioned in a thread about Bin Laden as an insult to Bin Laden.


http://volokh.com/2010/01/29/a-real-eco-terrorist/





-Howie has another post which mentions some of what is one the King site and here. There is a lot on the King site just posted to read and I did not have enough time to get it together.



http://www.struat.com/election/2010/...e-of-ladouche/


I will say this about what is on the King site about the EIR release by Lyn about Duggan



There is no limit to Lyn's sickness and how cold blooded the cult is.



I have to question if the grace of God just kept me a nobody in the LC for all of those years. There are numerous stomach turning moments I went through which to others was just business as usual. The popular line for members as told by the NCs was that we all needed to be like Lyn! In my delusional days, I imagined that to be that one would have a mastery of all subjects and be able to link everything in a sort if unified theory of the globe to answer all of my interests and questions. It seemed like that was what I was after and the LC gave you a sort of quick pass to that nirvana without having to really study, work or face someone who actually knows what they were talking about.



What happened as the years went by was something which stabbed me in the heart over and over. I found that whatever the LC was doing beyond rasing money was creating a very hard core cultism of cold blooded hatred of what was not us. No one knew any field outside of the LC and Lyn. You did not disagree with the names printed in our publications, you had to hate them for their role in killing humanity. You could justify anything in the LC as long as it led to our imaginary world of Lyn where the MAGLEV's run on time. There was a way to link to everything to this and if a member did not do enough, he or she was weak. We turned on our contacts to steal from them and laugh about it while later denying that we did anything wrong. The only emotional connection I had was to some fellow members whom I have known for many years. Even then you could see the changes as they too were undergoing a never ending stress of insanity which screwed up their lives.



Years ago, some LYMsters said I was too weak for the LC and could not handle the pressure. They were right. I could not handle the never ending abuse and destruction of people I was witnessing first hand. There was always this sort of boundry I knew existed that I would have to cross to be like the others.



Who knows what we will be finding out next about what we did and what Lyn was supporting. Today I was reading about how the president of Argentine has ordered the release of hundreds of thousands of pages of documents involving the Military government's program of eliminating undesirables from the mid 1970s to 1983. Argentina was one of favorite places at the time. We used to organise around the Rio De Plata region as being the bread basket for the world. During the Malvinas war. there was nothing that was ever wrong in Argentina. They were at war with the British and I can still recall NEC member Warren H telling us the latest update from Lyn and his war advisors about how Britain would be defeated so easy. How easy it was to praise the Argentina govt back then and write about Peron as a humanist to call up for EIR subs.





xlcr4life@hotmail.com

Shameless, Shameful
 

Speaking of Dennis King's website and its posting concerning LaRouche's latest rant against Jeremiah Duggan and his family http://lyndonlarouchewatch.org/larouche-google-news.pdf--

I think it's useful to reprint in full that "press release"—principally to give a flavor of Lyn's viciousness and industrial-strength dishonesty, and secondarily to convey exactly how Alz the old heimer has gotten. While you're working on decoding the syntax, I'll be counting up the number of times he uses the word "relevant."

A Crucial Slant on the David Kelly Case

By Lyndon H. LaRouche, Jr.

Jan. 28 (EIRNS)—So far, the British parties involved in the somewhat celebrated affair of suspected links between both the deaths of Dr. David Kelly and what has been fraudulently represented as the alleged non-suicide of Jeremiah Duggan, have failed to disclose crucially relevant facts respecting the subject's, Jeremiah Duggan's, relevant mental health history since childhood until his suicide in the vicinity of Wiesbaden, Germany.

The British circles have curiously failed to take into account statements reportedly made by Jeremiah himself shortly before his suicide, to the effect that he was having difficulty in securing some medication essential to his mental stability. Even without such information, the facts of the manner of Duggan's death, strongly indicate a mental health problem. Where is the relevant British investigation of the matter of the suicide of Jeremiah Duggan? What of such relevant facts as his reported statements regarding past emotional disturbances dating from his childhood, and indicating a role of the London Tavistock Clinic at some point in this case? Are there not additional areas of investigation of Jeremiah's mental health status absolutely required for judgment in a case in which relevant eyewitnesses have presented reported facts confirming three separate acts of attempted suicide, in quickly repeated succession?

Since the core of the utterances from British sources have stubbornly asserted falsified facts on relevant matters in the case, facts repeatedly shown to have been false to established facts, is there not a clear and strong suggestion that there is a connection between the dubious finding of suicide in the case of Dr. David Kelly, and the fraudulent denial of well-documented eyewitness evidence of the actually suicide of Jeremiah? Is not my appearance twice on the BBC broadcasts in the matter of Prime Minister Tony Blair's lying pretext for launching war against Iraq, as this fact of the matter was emphasized by Dr. Kelly, the primary area of fact bearing on Erica Duggan's launching what has been a largely fraudulent campaign against me, launched by important associates of Blair in the setting of the death of Dr. Kelly, of the highest relevance in the behavior of certain British circles in the strange role of Erica Duggan?

If that evidence respecting such highly relevant matters as the strongly implied mental health problems of Jeremiah Duggan, is not supplied by the relevant British sources, then, in light of already clearly established facts, is it not clear that the political motives of those British interests pushing the denial of Jeremiah's suicide, must be called into question in this matter, especially in any case, such as the case of the Duggan suicide, in which the issue of the lying by former Prime Minister Tony Blair, on the subject of launching a war against Iraq, is the crucial setting of the crafting of what has already been shown to have been a politically motivated, fraudulent allegation?

What It Means

In this brief release, LaRouche manages to hurl more vitriol at Jeremiah Duggan and his mother Erica than normal people could credit.

The constant mutterings about Jeremiah's "strongly implied mental health problems" are slanderous and libelous. What possesses LaRouche to say, and then repeat in print, so many falsehoods about so many people?

Here, of course, the reason is obvious: LaRouche is terrified that Erica Duggan's recent success in court in Britain will reopen the case of Jeremiah Duggan's death--something which could have vast consequences for LaRouche and his organization.

We know LaRouche has lawyers--one thing he can always afford, as has been demonstrated again recently in a Kronberg case hearing, where Lyn et al. were represented by a phalanx of lawyers.

All the more strange, then (given that he has lawyers), that he should actually print something like this: "Even without such information, the facts of the manner of Duggan's death, strongly indicate a mental health problem."

In other words, even if everything LaRouche has said about Jeremiah's "mental health problems" is untrue--the details concerning the circumstances of his death show that he had such a problem.

But wait! The "facts of the manner of Duggan's death" are precisely what's at issue. Is LaRouche saying he knows what those facts are?

This has always been the central conundrum: The organization has insisted that it had nothing to do with Jeremiah's death, but has mobilized internationally--frantically--to prevent a reopening of the case. The obvious question is: why such a frenzy?

The organization has veered between denying knowledge of the circumstances of Duggan's death, on the one hand, and on the other, insisting it was suicide. Again, if the organization had nothing to do with it: why insist it was suicide?

How do they know?

Who are these "eyewitnesses" LaRouche refers to who "have presented reported facts confirming three separate acts of attempted suicide, in quickly repeated succession"?

If someone tried to commit suicide—three times—in front of you, wouldn’t you act to stop it?

And what is LaRouche talking about when he writes, "Where is the relevant British investigation of the matter of the suicide of Jeremiah Duggan?"?

What he sees looming ahead of him is precisely the relevant British investigation into the death of Jeremiah Duggan, and the reason for that investigation is that the responsible authorities are dissatisfied with the conclusion of suicide.

Now they wish to ascertain how, in fact, he died.

As for the David Kelly red herring? This is typical of the LaRouche fog machine--David Kelly and Jeremiah Duggan both died in 2003. Both were British. Both were officially said to have committed suicide. Therefore, obviously, to the mind of an unwell man, they must be connected.

As for the details of the "connection"? Wheels within wheels.

Duggan and Tennenbaum
 

One and All:

Jonathan Tennenbaum was one of two LaRouche representatives that met with Erica and Hugo Duggan shortly after Jeremiah died, when they traveled to Wiesbaden.

To my knowledge he was assigned this "job" because, formally, he is Jewish and on occasion he can sound semi-sane and at least pretend to act like a human being. This put him in "the upper 20% of family personality brackets" in the LaRouche organization.

My understanding of his role is that, at minimum, he was responsible for dealing with the Duggans and, more to the point, he was probably assigned the role of figuring out what really happened. Then he could help formulate plans/ploys/ways to handle "the problem". Surely, he served as a conduit of intelligence information--a one-way conduit. Without question he told his bosses, Lyndon and Helga LaRouche, everything that happened during his meetings and conversations with the Duggans.

I doubt he was DIRECTLY involved in Jeremiah's death, but I would bet my left testicle that he knows more about what REALLY happened then virtually anyone else.

Now, everyone who has read this board for the past year or two knows my views on all the "relevant" topics, but one issue continues to escape me:

Why hasn't more attention been focused on Jonathan Tennenbaum and his role in the Duggan coverup?

He is the obvious person to concentrate on here. No? Am I wrong? If so then please, someone, come up with a good counter-argument. I am all ears.

That he is my brother is of zero concern as I am only interested in Truth and Justice. Let the chips fall where they SHOULD fall, and by the grace of God. Quite frankly, it would not bother me if my brother jumped off a bridge. I would not shed a single tear. That is a callous and cold statement, but at this point, I simply do not care. We are ALL brothers and sisters and my view is that our TRUE purpose here on earth is to help others. Blood ties mean little to me and LaRouchian "politics" is simply an emotional plague. Actual relationships mean everything.

In five minutes, Erica Duggan demonstrated more courage, decency, and basic human kindness then my brother has shown me in 33 years.

Again, I suggest that the relevant parties involved should concentrate on Jonathan Tennenbaum. He can either step up and be a man for the first time in his life or he can continue to protect Lyndon H. LaRouche Jr. -- one of the most vicious life-hating a-holes I have ever met.

Golden Souls? Yeah, sure. That is the insane delusion needed to cover up the truth: There isn't enough gold in the universe to fill the empty souls of these monsters.

Peter Tennenbaum January 30, 2010

BorisMaglev had a great line about this precise method of Lyn's. When cornered, Lyn releases ink like a squid. The next thing to consider is that this is all for internal consumption, no matter how crazy it reads to the outside world. Lyn has been able to pi$$ ink when needed for gullible members at will. He knows that if you accept him as your master, then you do not question the insanity no matter how many cases of Rhiengau or Connecto were drunk in producing the delusions.


The day you question anything is the day you have become like Dorothy and her friends when they met the Wizard.


For LYM and LYMettes, this is an excellent example of why after spending 330 MILLION dollars and wasting some many lives that the cult is smaller then ever and spinning like a hamster on a wheel. The key item here is that Lyn writes for the internal audience to keep you in the cult. The real world picks up Lyn's ramblings and either laughs at it or sees a small time Hitler,Stalin, Taliban or whatever. YOU end up swallowing this crap hourly and trying to make it appear sanitized to the outside world. When you do find someone who finds something interesting , you forget that they are intererested in a tiny portion, not the whole lunacy or joining a cult.



What I posted a few days ago about Lyn answering a question about Energy Flux Density should give you a clue that it is all cheap parlor tricks for a few hundred to oooh and aahhh while the rest of us laugh. Don't feel bad, it took me a while to figure it out too.



Larouche Palooza 2010!



-What happened here as we had a great tease?




http://www.groupsrv.com/science/post-3525968.html





-The votes for Lyn increase the lead! There are more brains in a Marilyn Manson forum then in the NEC for God's sake!



http://www.nachtkabarett.com/babalon...r-/post:113537





-A new Larouche Jabroni "Linda from NY" showing up in a Chicago blog?


http://citizenwells.wordpress.com/20...ulias-progres/



-Punishment for number 33 of The 50 Most Loathsome Americans, 2009?

http://www.democracyforums.com/showthread.php?t=39361




-A Larouche Jabroni in heat on the God Like forum. Didn't Lyn predict a complete collapse in January?



http://www.godlikeproductions.com/fo...sage977902/pg1





-It is so funny to how the cult is taking over in their own mind while they get ignored. Lyn can't even get his name spelled right.



http://www.moviehdtrailers.net/?p=887







This is the march to world power which 330 MILLION dollars has created.

Anyone have a review of the latest groundbreaking webcast?


xlcr4life@hotmail.com

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mH5XQ843RvU
Did Jim Cramer (never minding his credibility problem, and the tone of his show) say "Queen of England"?

Of some note, here's Jeff Rense with an interview on that old chestnut "The Franklin Scandal".
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ehvj3KJ0-lI&

The End of the Obama Administration
 

This will be rather brief. I will just focus on those elements of the speech that deal with the stated topic of the speech, The End of the Obama Administration. LaRouche starts off explaining where we're headed and why. "We are headed, right now, into a dark age; without some very radical changes in policy, the planet will go into several generations of a dark age, in which the plans are, on the British side, and similar sides, to reduce the world's population from approximately 6.7 billion people today, to an early arrival at less than 2. That is what's behind the policy of the British, that's what's behind the European policy, that's what's behind the policy of Obama, who is nothing but a British puppet—as I warned you on the 11th of April last year, that this man is a British puppet. He's not really a loyal American in any functional sense. He's a puppet of a foreign, enemy power."

Then he draws a comparison of Obama to Emperor Nero, "He's not particularly intelligent. He's like the Emperor Nero. And if you think of what I said about him, on the 11th of April last year, and described him as a Nero, and think very carefully of what he's done as policymaking, and the way he has reacted to crises, since April 11th of last year to the present time, you know, and are warned, that what you have on your hands is a virtual copy of the Emperor Nero. The real-life Nero of that time sexually assaulted his mother and then killed her; and took his best friend, and it took him four times to successfully kill his best friend. He said the same thing that Obama has said recently, that he's too good for the American people, as Nero said he's too good for the people of Rome." Then he makes a political prediction, "This Obama is finished. He has not been removed, but his utility, his survival in the Presidency, is very short."

Then, he makes what might be considered a controversial statement, if it were to be taken seriously. No chance of that, this is LaRouche talking, "But in any case, as long as this man controls the United States, there's no chance of the United States continuing to exist, or much of anything."

Then he offers a political analysis of what's happening inside the United States, "Americans don't hate Obama very much: They despise him. Because they don't think he's really responsible. They're willing to accept the fact that they've got a President who is a pig, or whatever Obama really is; they're willing to admit that. But what they hate—you know, you hate the member of your family who's gone against you, more than you hate the outsider. Obama, for the American population generally, is an outsider. He can't betray you, because he never was part of you. The hatred of the American citizen, by and large, is directed against the members of Congress, who support Obama! You saw that clearly in the Massachusetts vote, recently, on the replacement of the deceased Senator Kennedy. The hatred of the people out there is against the members of Congress who support Obama. They hate what they consider their friends, their representatives, who have betrayed them to the enemy, to the outsider Obama! This process has taken the form of a mass strike, which became clear in August of last year. People came out, at these town hall meetings, so-called, they came out in masses, and they said to the members of Congress, "Shut up! We want to tell you something, you stupid jerk! You betrayed us! You're supporting policies that would kill us! We don't like you any more! But we want you do the right thing, for a change." The people are no longer thinking of screaming at the guys who are supposed to represent them, and saying, "Now, do the right thing." They're saying, "We want you out!" They want the elected members of Congress to disappear! Especially, the Democratic members of the Congress, they want them gone! They look at the members of the Congress as either criminals, or stinking cowards—weaklings, foolish weaklings. They hate them! And you see that they're dropping like flies. They still are voting for Obama on this and that piece of legislation, but the people out there, hate them." In Sum, the American people hate Congress for supporting Obama, who is an outsider, or foreign enemy, or whatever. This analysis doesn't really explain why Obama was overwhelmingly voted into office a little more than a year ago. But it does play up to the hopes the cult candidates have of being able to capture a seat in Congress, the mass strike will help them get elected.

Then he explains how Obama will be removed from office, he and his organization will make it happen! "We must have Obama removed from the Presidency. We don't have to remove everybody in the Presidential team; we just simply take out Obama, and those people who are prototypes, the so-called behaviorists. We have to get rid of Bernanke. We have to get rid of Geithner. You have to get rid of all these people of the team—you have to get Rahm Emanuel out of there, get his brother out of medicine before he kills more people, and so forth. You have to take that particular element, inside the Presidential institutions, and get rid of them. Go! Scat!"

That's all he really says that relates to the stated topic, everything else is memory relapses into the past, a recount of history through a LaRouchican perspective, and a rehash of current proposals the organization wants on the table; the 4-power agreement, nuclear power, space exploration, bankruptcy reorganization, a credit system, putting people to work at productive jobs, etc.

So there you have it, the survival of the United States depends on Obama's early retirement, asassination, or impeachment. Quite a task he's given his organiztion, Get rid of the constitutional elected President, or you, your family, and country won't live much longer!

It's funny LaRouche didn't make the slightest mention of his failed January surprise prediction of a total collapse of everything. You would think if he took his own predictions seriously, he would be trying to explain why things didn't exactly pan out as he'd indicated. I guess one of the fringe benefits of being a cult leader is not having to be accountable to anyone for the things you say. I'm guessing the January surprise prediction was just a cheap parlor trick to get people to come back from their families following the holidays, or to prevent them from being tempted to leave the organization during the time the cult has to worry the most about members leaving. The LPAC cult candidates is another example of a parlor trick or scam to keep people interested and working for the organization. Except this one is aimed at the younger members, and supporters outside the organization. This too is another phantasm, that won't go anywhere.

Chator good summary of both the webcast and how the cult operates. Lyn can basically look forward to another 7 years of keeping the LYMsters spinnning their wheels if Obama wins another term. By then, the first crop of LYM and LYMettes will be made into the new enemy of Lyn in keeping him from ruling the universe. Lyn has pretty good genes for a longer life and endless health care, unlike say Don P for example.


For the current bomers in the LC, they have been so destroyed that they can not seem to see that this is the same broken record of Lyn from the 1970s and on. I do not know about many of you, but I find it depressing to see some members whom I have known from at least 35 and years ago still being serfs while mouthing the same program with different villians. For the researchers into cult life under Lyn, it is a clinical study in how a few dozen or so leftovers follow the same mad man who just replaces one villain with another and has the same basic plot composed of.

Nuclear War

Economic Collapse

New Dark Ages

I mention depressing only if you knew those people when they were very young and how much talent they had and how they ended up. The early 1980s meeting with Lyn in the NYC Sutton Place Town House was where Lyn basically told members that THEY will never leave the card table shrines. By golly, there are several who have made Lyn's prophecy come true today.



Larouche Palooza 2010!


-The mass strike hits Boston and Rachel Brown is well on her way to the DC House. This is Teabagging vs Carpetbagging.


http://datechguy.wordpress.com/2009/...n-tea-parties/



http://datechguy.wordpress.com/2010/...strikes-again/



-Quite a list here that 330 MILLION dollars has brought you Lyn.

http://openintelligence.amplify.com/...-jive-economy/




-The real use of Larouche is noted here.

http://groups.google.com/group/alt.p...e38db77fd36816




-Maybe someone here knows this person or can explain this from an Aryan web site. At least Nancy Spannaus gets a mention.

http://www.vnnforum.com/showthread.php?p=1096755

-Here is our funny blog of the day post. Somone twitters about the cult and we find a Lyndon Larouche chiming in! Check out the thread.

http://blogs.wickedlocal.com/brookli...-stupid-ideas/



-No gives a rat's ass about Lyn on this Ron Paul forum.

http://surf4residual.com/1158/ron-pa...serve-hr-1207/


-The cult shows up and leaves while the commentators really do not care.

http://www.philzone.org/discus/messa...tml?1265142390



To sum up

Lyn gave another world historical webcast and after a few days it looks like no one saw it and no one cares if they saw it as they sure do not care about the cult. This makes the analysis by Chator right on the money. The only audience Lyn has after 330 MILLION dollars worth of daily intrusions into people's lives is the immediate cult. That audience may one day notice that you could run any of Lyn's webcasts in any order and peddle them as brand new since the only intent is to keep the tiny sect going.


xlcr4life@hotmail.com

Looks like this is a year that a Larouchie might be able to sneak through the cracks in a Dem primary race. Well, it would be in a different condition for the cult.

http://www.suntimes.com/news/metro/2...020410.article
Former U.S. Sen. Adlai Stevenson — who formed a third party to run for governor in 1986 rather than share the same ticket as two disciples of Lyndon H. LaRouche — said Gov. Quinn faces the same political reality in dealing with running mate Scott Lee Cohen.

“It would be very difficult for Pat Quinn, in good conscience, to run for governor with this fellow tied to him as if they’re joined at the hip,” Stevenson told the Sun-Times today.

“One answer is to do what I did, namely to resign the nomination and run as an independent with a different lieutenant governor candidate,” he said. “Of course, they can try to talk [Cohen] out of it, but I’m skeptical as to whether that would work.”

Stevenson, who won the Democratic gubernatorial primary in 1986, formed the Solidarity Party rather than run with a LaRouche-backed lieutenant governor candidate, Mark Fairchild.

Stevenson wound up losing the general election to Republican Gov. James Thompson, who got 1.65 million votes to the 1.25 million that went to Stevenson and his Solidarity Party candidacy. Another 208,830 votes were cast for the Democratic governor’s slot that Stevenson vacated.

Howie Amazing that the Lt Gov candidate is viewed in the same fasion as Lyn, has this as just a part of his his life story.



http://www.chicagobreakingnews.com/2...thdrawing.html









Larouche Palooza 2010





-Depending on where you stand, this is not exactly the best news to come out of the Nashville Tea Bag convention. go down a nit and you will see that someone posted the video of our very own "Hitler Hippie Chick" Rachel Brown and her short fame as a dining room table with Barney Frank.



http://www.dailykos.com/story/2010/2...ng-open-thread




-In Seattle we get a guilty plea bargain from a man who got entangled with the cult.



http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/htm...yndication=rss





-The Larouche Card is played in a critique of NPR.



http://currentlogic.blogspot.com/201...t-wingers.html





-A problem with a Tea Party member who has "NIggar" on his signs.



http://pajamasmedia.com/blog/dale-ro...riend-of-ours/





-Funny and interesting new encyclopedia bio of Lyn on the web!



http://encyclopediadramatica.com/Lyndon_LaRouche





-The cult really does sing for spare change. Check out this mass strike rally and see the tip bucket as the LYMettes sing.



http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ta6Oj7SgMXg



-So what do the masses think about the cult? Why Lyn is an Emperor!



http://forums.mycathatesyou.com/view...54fc0d7819c78e






-Another member who has mastered the "Larouche Method" in Australia! The whole articel is worth reading for fun.



http://www.crikey.com.au/2010/02/04/...enaud-blazers/





-Jeff Steinberg shows up here in this blog. This chap should know that Jeff sure condones Lyn's views.



http://yahyaottawa.blogspot.com/2010...t-and-cjc.html








-Here we find what that 330 million dollars of propogance about Lyn's genius has brought.



http://www.louisvillemojo.com/newfor...=159731&FID=17









What have I learned from all of this?



-This Lt Gov candidate in Illinois really has to be horrendous to have our 25 year or so old Illinois victory brought back to life. This is not to praise Cohen LYMsters, but to bury him. The other issue is that Mark Fairchild has been spending his ENTIRE LIFE after that victory at a card table shrine for Lyn.



-The web really is the enemy of Lyn as he gets laughed at daily as a few keystrokes releases the info about him and the cult.



-In my day, "The Larouche Card" was something we claimed tin pot dictators would use to stay in power. Today, if you really want to insult or mock someone, you play "The Larouche Card".



-A joke I made about the cult singing for spare change for Lyn really is true as we see in the YouTube Boston video. Is Rachel Brown in that music video next to the spare change bucket?



-The Autralian cult's coverage should be a fine example of how members have replicated Lyn in their mind. There is a method to the madness and we read it right in front of us in that article. The worst thing for Lyn and the cult is to be asked a question with a camera or note pad present. Maybe future court rooms will bring this all together for us to enjoy further.



Every morning I usually put on a business cable channel to start the day. This past week has had an amazing amount of concern over bubbles in the Chinese economy . I do not think that Lyn has ever said a bad thing about China , their economy ,human rights, environment as long as he gets a few articles in a Chinese paper.



For the LYMand LYMettes and the deadenders left, they do not have a pot to pi$$ in and the one pot that they do have is for spare change.



Have a great Super Bowl weekend.



xlcr4life@hotmail.com

Campaign Update 2010
 

There's a new DWTT ("Down With The Traitors") video up here, http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=00hy-tLaOdo

Nothing really too interesting except an interview with the German LYM candidate mentioned by Patentrezept in his last post, and a video of Keesha Rogers addressing a Tea Party meeting. It seems the LYM are really going after the "fringe" republican vote. That should earn them a handful of votes!

In the meantime, the FEC website has new numbers on our LYM candidates:

Keesha Rogers has raised $3,326,

Rachel Brown has raised $1,776, and

Summer Shields has raised $1,345.

It looks like Keesha is beating her fellow LYM in fundraising, good for her. I mentioned earlier that her race was the one to watch given that her Democratic rivals are relatively weak. The filing fee to run as a candidate for the U.S. Congress in Texas is $3,125. So Keesha has actually now covered that cost with $201 left over. But her campaign, so far, with the cost of running the website, sponcering events, producing campaign videos and printing campaign posters, has probably exceeded that number. Meaning that her campaign is probably, so far, a net loss for the LaRouche organization. No matter, if the LaRouche organization is good at one thing, as xlcr has pointed out repeatedly, its at wasting money. If it wasn't being wasted on Keesha, I'm sure they'd find equally hopeless causes to waste it on.

Now let's look at Rachel. She has raised $1,776, but her only Democratic rival, Barney Frank, has raised $1,323,519. Meaning that he has outraised her by about a thousand times. Doesn't look to good Rachel, unless we compare your numbers against those of Summer Shields. He has raised $1,345 to Nancy Pelosi's $1,542,087. This means, she has outraised him by more than a thousand times! Where are all those mass strikers? If they gave you ten dollars each wouldn't you, at least, be equal with your Democratic rivals? Here's something to consider Summer. Given that the city of San Francisco has one of the highest minimum wage rates in the country, $9.79. Wouldn't you have more money, if you had worked 40 hours a week for the past two months?

Another interesting fact that comes up in looking at the FEC's numbers, is that all contributions are mentioned as coming from individual donors. Meaning that LPAC hasn't given a single dollar to any of its candidates!

Source: http://www.fec.gov/DisclosureSearch/mapHSApp.do

Erica Duggan vs. LaRouche
 

More on the Duggan case at Dennis King's website, http://lyndonlarouchewatch.org/erica...speaks-out.htm

There you can read Erica Duggan's Feb. 1 statement exposing the lies in LaRouche's repellent piece "A Crucial Slant on the David Kelly Case" http://www.larouchepac.com/node/13303

She concludes her statement by saying, "It is also time for those who were once members and even leaders in the LaRouche organization, and know the truth about it, to redeem themselves by speaking out openly and honestly. It is a hard thing to admit you were wrong, but remaining silent will only allow LaRouche to ruin more lives and wreak more harm on society."

And indeed, despite the absurdities of the LYM and the overall feeble-mindedness of their "organizing," most of us on this site know that the organization has ruined many lives.

We never forget Ken Kronberg, for example.

Meanwhile, on the "David Kelly" release Jan. 28 (which I commented on several days ago), let me add this observation:

Lyn's writing is like the picture of Dorian Gray--but strangely, where Dorian Gray hid his awful secret, Lyn flaunts his.

Speaking of Writing

Speaking of awful writing, check out Lyn's "We Are a Republic, Not a Democracy" on the LPAC site
http://www.larouchepac.com/node/13465

What a hoot. And the LYM editors of LPAC, with their unerring instinct for the absurd, have selected the following sentences from the Foreword to use to advertise the whole piece:

Today, we need the likeness of President Abraham Lincoln’s victory over the British empire’s backers of the practice of slavery, as we did then, as, in certain respects, still today This means, over the time of today’s system of predatory, followers of the “health care” of Hitler’s and Tony Blair’s practices, including a Blair legacy for which Obama had been chosen to attempt to push through in the guise of what private health-care insurers have been chosen to install today.

Questions, anyone? There in the back?

Sorry Lyn,
 

Sorry Lyn, the 'tea party' movement has just been hijacked...by Sarah Palin! http://politics.nashvillepost.com/20...arty-movement/

I know you and your LYM thought you had them eating out of your hand with that Obama-Hitler poster, but it looks like a coup has just stolen the tea party patriots away from you and transformed them into Palinites! But I'm sure that won't stop you and your LYM from continuing to trail after them, looking for handouts!

Now let's look at what that Obama-Hitler poster has done to one of your beloved LYM. LYMette, Keesha Rogers, who happens to be running for a congressional seat in Texas, gets fingered as a member of the LaRouche-Hitler youth!

LaRouche Hitler Youth Group CD22 Candidate

We have 3 very strange candidates running in the Democratic primary to challenge Pete Olson in CD22. One is a Libertarian. One has absolutely no clue. The other is a member of the LaRouche Hitler Youth Group, a far out (not left or right, just out) candidate. She, Keisha Rogers, is not a Democrat but that doesn't stop her from running as one.

CD22, the former district of Tom DeLay loves republicans. In 2008 they voted for Pete Olson who replaced a ranking Democrat, Nick Lampson, on the Science Committee in charge of NASA. Lampson would have been the chair of the Committee, instead voters replaced him with Olson, a space rookie. NASA's Constellation program has since been canceled in the 2011 budget, but at least CD22 has a republican Congressman.

Rogers ran for the Chair of the Texas Democratic Party in 2006. I think she got 20 or so votes from her Hitler Youth members. You might see the members standing in front of a post office handing out worthless LaRouche magazines complaining about something someone is doing and calling for interplanetary trade. (I am serious!) LaRouche people are good at complaining, but nothing else.

They tend to be young, but misguided. They would rather complain in front of a Post Office instead of walking door to door for a candidate. They also like to carry around pictures of Obama pictured as Hitler. Keisha is also calling for the impeachment of the President. Why? Who knows.

Regardless of who wins the primary, neither has a clue about running a campaign. There is a good reason why no good candidate wants to run in CD22. These candidates obviously do not know about this little secret.

Listen up, Keesha! Here's a warning from the Houston-area precinct chair,

John Coby said...

"Uh....as a condition of being a precinct chair we cannot endorse or support a non-Democrat.

Although that is the rule of the party, the clubs are not bound to those rules. If the libertarian or Laroucher gets the nod, they will not be allowed in our headquarters."


Source:http://bayareahouston.blogspot.com/2...roup-cd22.html

</i>Speaking of awful writing, check out Lyn's "We Are a Republic, Not a Democracy" on the LPAC site.</i>

"Republic, not a democracy" is a classic and vintage right wing axiom / slogan. In the hey-day of the John Birch Society, members would attend politicians' public meetings, and when that politicians referred to "democracy" or "democratic principles", shout out "Republic!" Ron Paul long spot-lighted on his House website a speech he made entitled "We Are all Democrats now", bemoaning our fall from grace from the Founding Fathers. Google the phrase "Republic, not a democracy" and you'll find it expressed here and there -- the new Larouche article comes up on page two and takes a back seat to old articles from Pat Buchanan, and various articles at, say, "Pajamasmedia" (the outlet that hired Joe the Plumber for some videos.)

I don't know if this is reaching out some people in the "Tea Party" milieu -- finding the margins of sentiment that will give them the donations -- or if it's internalizing the sentiment for the members as they haunt those places. But one thing interesting -- a good segment there view Lincoln's presidency as a key fall from grace moment away from the "Republic". But they always need to retain the deviations.

LaRouche in Faceoff with Euclid; Blinks First
 

I got another email several weeks ago from a source who is interested in Lyn’s Kulturkampf (that would be his Kampf against Kultur), handing me a quote from Lyn and asking for a comment.

I don’t know the provenance of this quote, but I have no doubt it’s Lyn’s. Who else would say this?

What you have to look at, is that population policy on the British side is very simple. And it has to do, not with simple issues that were debatable between the British and Leibniz, for example, but it goes back to an essential thing. It goes all the way back to Aristotle, and back to the adoption of Aristotle’s folly by Euclid. So you have the Euclidean conception, which is the Aristotelean conception, as this was denounced as an Aristotelean conception. This idea was to prevent the technological and cultural development of populations, because if technological and scientific progress occurred, and were to influence sociology, then empires could not exist. (Rubbish, by the way.)

And this whole thing, like the Aristotle operation, came after the death of Plato. It’s always been understood that technological and scientific progress affects populations intellectually and otherwise, such that empires cannot exist….

…The space program, for example, the killing of the space program, is actually the oligarchical principal (sic), which goes back to at least Aristotle and to Euclid. And those are the kinds of things that you’ve got to deal with.

Et cetera.

Now, I don’t know what anyone else’s particular interest in this passage may be, but mine is this: Does Lyn understand anything about Euclid?

I rummaged around the LPAC site, and found this telling passage from 2004, Lyn’s recollection of his distant school days (emphasis added):

For example, my initial and enduring personal hostility to Euclidean geometry erupted from within me on the first day of my high-school class in Plane Geometry. For me, the task of geometry was to uncover the principles which accounted for the increase of the functional strength contributed by an iron or steel beam, by eliminating certain weighty parts of a simply solid beam. It was apparent to me, from such experiences as frequent spectator visits to construction at Boston's Charles Town U.S. Navy Yard, there had to be principled way in which the beam must be crafted geometrically, to optimize its function of support. The idea of a geometry apart from the geometry of physical processes as such, was for me a disgusting, foolish enterprise. Against this, I revolted in that instant, and could never accept a standard doctrine for geometry after that.

You realize what we have here? We have a twofold confession:

1. Lyn couldn’t “do” high school geometry (hence the hostility).

2. Lyn’s concept of geometry is opposed to Plato’s—because the geometry of Plato is precisely geometry apart from the geometry of physical processes.

People steeped for years—marinated, really—in Lyn’s view of Plato will have to resist his grotesque mischaracterization of Plato as the “Philosopher of Becoming,” but once you do that, and re-read some Plato, you’ll see what I mean.

http://www.larouchepac.com/pages/eco...es_eir_eco.htm


Then, rummaging some more, I came up with this eyebrow-raiser from 2009 (“Rescuing the World’s Economy”)—again, emphasis is mine:

The follower of Aristotle, Euclid, chiefly copied into his own Elements the model solutions of earlier Classical Greek geometers, but added those infamous a-priori presumptions of his own making which echo Aristotle. The relevant issue of mathematical physics posed by this case, is expressed by the failure of the positivist David Hilbert's attempt to complete the process of solving the unproven assumptions of Nineteenth-century mathematics, most notably that of his sixth proposition, a proposition which goes directly to the point of Philo's attack on the theological argument of the Aristoteleans.

The Sixth Proposition, eh? What is Lyn talking about?

See Euclid's Sixth Proposition below.

Proposition 6

If in a triangle two angles be equal to one another, the sides which subtend the equal angles will also be equal one another.

Let ABC be a triangle having the angle ABC equal to the angle ACB.

I say that the side AB is also equal to the side AC.

For, if AB is unequal AC, one of them is greater.

Let AB be greater; and from AB the greater let DB be cut off equal to AC the less;
Let DC be joined.

Then, since DB is equal to AC, and BC is common,

the two sides DB, BC are equal to the two sides AC, CB respectively;

and the angle DBC is equal to the angle ACB;

therefore the base DC is equal to the base AB,

and the triangle DBC will be equal to the triangle ACB, the less to the greater, which is absurd.

Therefore AB is not unequal to AC;

It is therefore equal to it.

Therefore, etc.

Okay, Proposition 6—a piece of cake to prove. Does Lyn know what he’s talking about? Clearly, no.

But I do. He doesn’t mean Euclid’s Proposition 6, he means the Fifth Postulate. The famous Parallel Postulate—the one that reads as follows:

Let the following be postulated:

5. That, if a straight line falling on two straight lines make the interior angles on the same side less than two right angles, the two straight lines, if produced indefinitely, meet on that side on which are the angles less than the two right angles.

Okay. This is one of the most famous passages in mathematics. Among those who tried to prove it: Ptolemy, Proclus, Nasiraddin at-Tusi, Saccheri, Lambert, Legendre, Al-Hazan, Omar Khayyam, Clavius, Hilbert, Gauss (who never published his work), Bolyai, Lobachevsky, Klein, Poincare. These attempts, and failures, to prove the Fifth Postulate led to the generation of non-Euclidean geometries—geometries in which the Fifth Postulate did not obtain. Beltrami ultimately (1868) proved that the other postulates of Euclid were independent of the Fifth.

Lyn refers to it as an “unproved assumption,” but what is infinitely more interesting is that Euclid apparently had the good sense to include it among the postulates, even though it stands out so markedly from the other four.

In any case, because this is so famous a thing in the history of mathematics, it seems almost incredible that a mind as massive as Lyn’s should confuse the Fifth Postulate and the Sixth Proposition. Almost incredible, but not quite.

http://www.larouchepac.com/node/12017

Perhaps as almost incredible—but not quite incredible—is the following utterance of Lyn from a 2006 address to the Mexican LYM. As always, the emphasis is mine.

Now, the beginning is to attack Euclid as being a fraud. You can not derive a line from a point. You can not derive a surface from a line. You can not create a solid from a surface. Now, these are the elementary ironies, paradoxes, which are presented by Plato and by his predecessors among the Pythagoreans. You are subject to sophistry in schools, in which they teach you that these are definitions of axioms which you must accept. And they tell you you must use essentially linear algebraic methods. So you use linear algebraic methods, and you jump ahead assuming that you've proven something. You've proved nothing! Because what you did was, simply assume that Euclid was right. And Euclid was a fraud.

Oh, dear. Another embarrassment. Can you find the place where Euclid derives a line from a point? Or a surface from a line?

I didn’t think so.

Perhaps that was the approach in whatever plane geometry textbook Lyn was refusing to read back in 1936. Only in that sense could one call it Euclidean.

But not Euclid’s.

Euclid does not “derive” his points, lines, surfaces, and solids. He defines them.

Thus, in the very beginning of Book I of Euclid’s Elements, we have … Definitions. As follows:

1. A point is that which has no part.

2. A line is breadthless length.

...

4. A straight line is a line which lies evenly with the points on itself.

5. A surface is that which has length and breadth only.

And so forth.

Philosophically, these are fascinating definitions—especially, perhaps, Definition 1. But any way you slice it, Dedekind schnitt or no, there’s no generating of lines from points here, pal.

This is another one of those awkward moments where you realize: Lyn didn’t read the book, he saw the movie.

http://www.larouchepac.com/pages/spe..._monterrey.htm

The Root (Word) of Lyn's Axiom Problem
 

A further note on Lyn on Euclid and Hilbert:

To be fair, it may be that Lyn is speaking of Hilbert's Sixth Problem, not Euclid's Sixth Proposition (or Fifth Postulate).

In case that's what's on the old boy's mind, here's Hilbert's Sixth Problem:

Mathematical Treatment of the Axioms of Physics. The investigations on the foundations of geometry suggest the problem: To treat in the same manner, by means of axioms, those physical sciences in which already today mathematics plays an important part; in the first rank are the theory of probabilities and mechanics.

I believe Hilbert suggested probability and mechanics as two areas for fruitful work.

For Lyn to refer to Hilbert's "failure" to "solve" the "unproven assumptions" of 19th-century mathematics is sophomoric. Hilbert enunciated his 23 problems in mathematics in 1900--at the time, all were unsolved. It may be that some--and here the Sixth Problem leaps to mind--are in fact insoluble, so that Hilbert's "failure" is hardly his fault.

But Lyn will not be stayed by any such considerations.

As is well known, the very word "axiom" is enough to set Lyn off. Although organizers are taught to prattle about "changing one's axioms," the fact is that to Lyn the notion of an axiom is, er, anathema.

"Axiom," of course, comes from the Greek axiōma--something worthy, or worthy to be held; from axioun. to think or consider worthy, from axios worth, worthy--wait a minute--I think I see the problem!

Lyn was frightened by an Axios many years ago, and it's been all downhill from there.

At the sight of any axiomatic framework, the fit is on him again. The idea of a vast architecture of theorems derived from a small number of axioms causes tremendous anxiety in the subject.

This is because Lyn does not wish to be fettered by any laws of thought, as it were.

His individual sovereign creativity cries out, whenever confronted with a structure.

Hence the hostility, the animus, the venom. He cannot bear to be just another human being, bound by space and time, by rules and by mortality. Let alone by God.

None of that for Lyn. No sir.

Comic Relief
 

For those interested, there is a a great new comic book called Logicomix: An Epic Search for Truth by Apostolos Doxiadis and Christos Papadimitriou published by Bloomsbury Press in 2009. It's a bio of Bertrand Russell that ends just on the brink of World War II and it is about Russell, Cantor, Frege, Hilbert, Godel and the history of the Principia Mathematica. In it there are a few pages devoted to Hilbert's famous speech at the Paris Congress in 1900.

The irony here, of course, is that Lyn has and employs axioms himself. In fact, much intelligent thought is impossible without them. LYM are taught to fear and mistrust their axioms, and those of the population. If their thinking doesn't cohear 100% with Lyn's, it must be because they still have some 'false' axioms to get rid of. It is an eternal quest to beecome cleansed of the axioms one has picked up from the degenerated modern culture. Fear of one's axioms is fear of intelligent thought. It is but another technique Lyn uses to rule people from inside their own minds through blind terror.

EagleBeak That was a fantastic post on explaining the nonsense of Lyn. The cheap parlor tricks start with endless name dropping which always, always lead to how Lyn has identified the problem and has solved it to the delight of the members. The next question is just how can this cheap parlor trick work so well for decades? Well, it only works on LC and LYMsters as entire countries have seen Lyn for the crack pot that he is.

For members, it works this way. Remember those school discussons of genetics vs environment in determining intelligience, nature vs nurture?

In the cult you are no diffeent then a hamster on a wheel, spinning endlessly to get nowhere. You get to read the opuses of Lyn usually when you are dead tired, after a long day, or in short bursts when you have a few minutes. You are perpetually under high stress and this small moment is one of relief since you are reading the wisdom of the man whom you are devoting your life to and gave up so much for. The local NC will give a class on this opus , often after a long day of raising money and when the quota was made. Try 10PM for starters. Since you left college, you sure do not have the knowledge and you sure do not have the practical life experience to know when you are being bambozzled by Lyn. You sure do not wish to be the target of the NC in raising an objection to the all knowing Lyn. You also do not want the local giving you a look for keeping them up so late since you have to get up again so early to do this over and over.

When you are in the Bizarro World, you need to find assurance that you are in the right place. This leads to an interesting pheonomena I am noticing with many members lately when they post on a blog.

"Larouche was right" is the current crutch to hold on to to answer why you just saw 3 or 4 decades of your life speed right past you. You have to justify this waste of an adult life by finding that one or two bits of Lyn saying something which remotely can pass as acceptable. You will surgically remove every bit of lunacy and douvble talk by Lyn where he is all over the place and just focus on a few lines. The jabronis do this , yet what we see is that the majority of other comments are completely the opposite and point out the double talk of Lyn and his insanity.

There are some real winning sentences in EagleBeak's posts.

Marinated by Lyn!

That is what I was looking for in how to describe what happens to a member who at one time had some brains and then spends three or four decades in servitude to Lyn. Brainwashing is too cliche and marinated sounds just right. We will find an excellent example of this below in the case of Gerald Pechenuk




That was a pretty good Super Bowl Sunday night. It also ended relatively early which surprised me. This reminded me when we had a conference around the same time as the Super Bowl. Lyn heard some people buzzing about the upcoming game and he had to tell the audience that he knew the winner because the game is fixed and he knows how to fix fotball games! How come we never bet the income in Vegas on the Super Bowl? We could have made as much money as we made on knowing what the Stock Market was going to do.

As Homer Simpson would say:

"Is there anything Larouche can't do!"


I was also suprised as how much coverage there was of the 1986 Illinois chain of events following the victory of Scott Cohen in Illinois. He has resigned that spot, but our very own Gerald Pechenuk , perhaps a 35 year member who has kept Lyn living large comes into this blog for laughs.



When reading this, keep in mind that we were able to get Lyn to meet with a lot of people by relentless phone work by hundreds of people daily. What happens AFTER Lyn meets someone is that they see Lyn as Bat $hit crazy and leave for good. Then, we tell the members that Kissinger harrased them. If they are tin pot dictators or nobodies or people who are forgotten, then we we have a prayer of hooking them for a while. Gerald never has figured out that most people, including members I must add, who meet with Lyn leave the encounter convinced that he is crazy.





http://www.ballot-access.org/2010/02...comment-784791



Larouche Palooza 2010!



-We head over to Howie's blog "The Larouche Challenge" to pick up the Pechenuk puzzle . You think Gerald Pechenuk will see that mass strike after 330 million dollars was spent on it? Gerald only put in most of his life and has seen them come and go.



http://www.struat.com/election/categ...che-challenge/



-We find some press coverage of the guilty plea bargain in a Saettle card table shrine case, but not what the cult expects.



http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/htm...sparian5m.html





http://blogs.seattleweekly.com/daily...ads_guilty.php



I think that the "R. Wesser" who shows up at the end is Bob Wesser who joined in the mid 1970s and is still a Card table shriner who many people feel sad that he is still outdoors . Wesser came in a few years after Operation Mop Up.




http://slog.thestranger.com/slog/arc...really-deserve


-Upest at being carpetbagged by the cult at Tea Party rallies.

http://forum.myspace.com/index.cfm?f...upID=100047178


-In our Last update we read about a hillarious encounter a writer had with the cult in Australia while Lord Monckton spoke. The connecto well went dry that night I guess for our two Aussie. This is a pretty long column and comments about the cult.

http://rankexploits.com/musings/2010...-on-the-right/

-Keesha gets some blogger coverage here.

http://muse-musings.blogspot.com/201...or-obamas.html





-I have to throw this in to show how the mass strike is overwhemling.



http://www.****france.com/topic/3617...he-change.html





-Who gets the college voter, Rachel or Barney?



http://dailycollegian.com/2010/02/07...uted-minority/






-The cult in my guess really thinks that the mention of Lyn and the 1986 Illinois election must really be good for them. In LC folklore, you don't talk about how voters rejected us after that and then testified against us to lock us up!



http://thinkingorsitting.blogspot.co...-illinois.html





http://www.cdobs.com/archive/feature...llinois,125999





-Rachel Brown gets a mention here.



http://degreesofmoderation.blogspot....ns-win-in.html





-Lyn is mentioned here with other anti gaming people. Nothing much. If you get SHOWTIME network. Penn and Teller have an upcomg repeat on video games which is worth a watch.



http://www.gamepolitics.com/2010/02/...r-sas-training



http://forums.worldofwarcraft.com/th...sid=1&pageNo=4



-Lyn gets a mention in an ex Scientology forum.



http://www.forum.exscn.net/showthread.php?p=372096







What have I learned today?



I think the best lesson is from [b[EagleBeak[/b] in seeing how a closer examination of what Lyn actually says and writes shows you what a farce this all is. Many of us have had that moment, but maybe it took a a lot of them or something else to pop us loose. In any event, we can clearly see how a Larouche "marination" works in eventually eliminating the critical thinking skills required in life. For someone such as a Gerald Pechenuk, he joins a few dozen other elderly members who went through the same thing as we did, but chose to stay in for life. What is obvious to outsiders who run into the cult and from what we find in Larouche Palooza 2010 is that it really is The Bizarro World where up is down and left is right.



In reading blogs where the cult enters, I really get the sense of urgency to convince oneself that "Larouche was right". That way of thinking is what may be the last threads holding one in. Over the years I have noticed how former members still may contribute to the cult. Often these members were denounced left and right after leaving. Most LCers have left the cult and so have a lot of LYM and LYMettes. What remains will be the hardest of the bunch who by the nature or the beast, will be the wackiest. The public wil recognise this and there shoudl be a never ending supply of anger and disgust for the cult. The cult in turn will view this as proof that they are doing the right thing in angering the masses in order to lead them. Just read what Lyn writes closely and you will see this cheap parlor trick done in the Q/A of LYM meetings.





xlcr4life@hotmail.com

'A Republic, not a democracy' is technically correct, but what it ignores or de-emphasizes are the 18th century philosophical currents that gave rise to America's form of governement. Republics are not new, they go back to ancient Greece. Democracy, however, was a new idea at the time of America's founding, and it was incorporated into the Republican model. Little has to be said about how much LaRouche despises democracy, as this is well know. He regards the masses as sheep that must be led by a strongman, not just any strongman, but him only. This makes Lyn's politics akin to fascist dictatorship, or totalitarian government. Domestically, America is a republic, but internationally, it is an empire. LaRouche fails to see this as well. For him, there is only one empire, the British empire. Any empire like actions undertaken by America is just Britian acting through its puppets. They maybe Americans, but in Lyn's view, they are not. They are British agents. Lyn has a serious case of mental myopia.

What's wonderful in LaRouche's distorted view of how the world works is that he complains against Obama cancelling the manned moon mission. In itself, this would be fine and I would even be in agreement. However, of course, he links this to the oligarchical worldview of the British Empire. In his equation then, the greatest oligarchs would have to have been the German Nazi Rocket Scientists who were pushing the frontiers of space scientist in their day. Then of course, there would be the Soviets who carried on the space program and helped spur the US to compete in space.

Half-Empty for Texas
 

As mentioned in my previous post, new FEC numbers reveal how much the LPAC cult candidates have raised since last year. In comparing these numbers to those of their Democratic rivals we discover a few things. First, both Rachel Brown and Summer Shields have both been outraised by about a thousand times each. This means that for every dollar raised by Rachel, or Summer at a cardtable shrine exposed to the elements, Barney and Nancy raise 1 grand each to match it. Anyone smell defeat? The picture isn't so bleak for Keisha Rogers, who is campaigning against relatively weak Democratic rivals, despite having been denounced as a non-Democrat by the Houston-area precinct chair. She's still at the bottom of the dogpile in fundraising, but not doing as bad when we consider how much her Democratic rivals have put into funding their own campaigns. We find that she is only slightly behind Minister Weider in individual contributions ($3,325-Keisha vs. $3,524-Weider), and ahead of the Texas Democratic Party's chosen candidate, James Blatt ($800). Though he is ahead of both in overall fundraising dollars due to a personal $10,000 injection into his own campaign and $2,600 from the TDP.

Source: http://www.fec.gov/DisclosureSearch/mapHSApp.do

The following is an interesting blogpost from a Democrat in Texas' 22nd CD that reveals some interesting facts about Keisha's rivals, and why a Democrat must reject Keisha Rogers.


For Texas CD22: That's Blatt

Logically, the follow-up to my endorsement of Robert Pruett for the Democratic nomination in the Texas CD 14 congressional race is to produce an endorsement for one of the three who are running for the Democratic nomination in my own congressional district, Tom DeLay’s old CD 22.

Also known as the Fighting 22nd.

With Nick Lampson unable to draw enough Republican crossovers or Independents to make a difference in 2008, we are now saddled with Grand No Partier extraordinaire, Pete “Just Say No” Olson.

By the way, I have Pete on video for his entire speech given at the TEA Party event in Sugar Land last April and I excerpted parts of it on a posting, but maybe as we get closer to the November election we need to see more of it.

Pete Olson chumming it up with the Teabaggers. That’s just plain fun.

But I digress.

This year Democrats have three candidates running for the Democratic nomination to run against Olson in November. They are, alphabetically, Doug Blatt, an Information Systems specialist (aka computer geek), Kesha Rogers, a political activist, and Freddie “John Wieder” Jr., a real estate broker, businessman and recently ordained minister.

Let’s dispense of the last, first.

“John Wieder” (why does he put two names in quotes?) is a Libertarian. We know this because he ran as such against Nick Lampson and Pete Olson in ’08. Wieder has lots of issues and I don’t just mean the political ones.

What I have learned from limited contact, and maximal perusal of his website, Wieder is running on a platform of God, Guns, and the universal right of all old guys to wear tacky, tacky ties.

Next.

Lakesha “Kesha” Rogers is a LaRouche Democrat. She is a fervent follower of the LaRouche Movement. When I first encountered Kesha this was very apparent from the very first paragraph of her literature. She has since buried the LaRouchian rhetoric in paragraph 4 of her recent literature. But I really like paragraph 5 much better:

“My intention in running is not to wait until January 2011 to implement this (LaRouche) plan, but to use my campaign, and those of my fellow LaRouche Youth Movement members also running for the Democratic nomination for Congress – Rachel Brown, who will oust incumbent menace Barney Frank, and Summer Shields, who will retire Speaker Nancy Pelosi – to mobilize the American people NOW, to regect the fascist policies imposed by the British monarchy, through its puppet Obama, in favor of the ‘LaRouche Plan’ which is in the tradition of those policies which have historically led to prosperity for out nation, and happiness for our people.”

As I said, a favorite passage of mine. Very revealing. As revealing as "Plan 9 From Outer Space" (Obama, a puppet to the British Monarchy? . . .yep). Winning, it seems, is not foremost in her mind. Using her candidacy to promote other races is.

Guys, read up on it yourselves. The LaRouche Movement is an “out there” political cult that is, in my opinion, as eclectic as the Libertarian Movement. But mainly, I have never forgiven the LaRouche Movement for foisting upon California voters Proposition 64 in 1986: a ballot proposition that was soundly defeated by Californians by a 4 to 1 margin.

Proposition 64 sought to restore the disease AIDS (Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome) to the list of communicable diseases. Had this passed, this would in effect have required the quarantine of hundreds of thousands of Californians with HIV and AIDS, denying them a right to work for a living. They made wild claims that AIDS could be transmitted by insects, respiratory contact, and indeed any casual contact whatsoever. They called their campaign the “Prevent AIDS Now Initiative Committee” (PANIC). The proposition was resubmitted in 1988 with similar result.

They finally got the message.

So I have to reject Rogers as well. Rogers = LaRouche.

Leaving us with the computer geek, Doug Blatt.

Now make no mistake, Blatt is about as new to politics as he can get. He has experience in Information Systems working in the Michigan Legislature so there’s that. But Blatt’s issues are the Democratic Party’s issues.

He is for reforming “No Child Left Behind”
He is for repealing the Bush tax cuts.
He is for reform or repeal of the Patriot Act (well . . .which is it?)
He is for Medicare for All
He sees the need to build a mass transit system connecting Houston with the outlying areas in the district.

Already I have a problem with the first four words in the second paragraph, but we can’t agree all of the time.

So it’s really a no-brainer here. First we need to clear the field for the only true Democrat on the primary ballot.
Then we go from there.


Source: http://halfempth.blogspot.com/2010/0...ats-blatt.html

So on the one hand Keisha is competing for the tea-party vote with Pete Olsen, and John Wieder, and on the other, with Doug Blatt, for the Democratic vote. Doug Blatt has the charisma of a school yard geek, but the Democratic Party establishment in Texas has gotten behind him largely to oppose Keisha and Wieder, whom they don't regard as "real" Democrats.

In any case, all three of the Democratic candidates are doing very poorly in fundraising compared to the Republican incumbent Pete Olsen, who has raised more than half a million, which is way down from the over 2 million he raised two years ago to defeat Democratic incumbent, Nick Lampson. This means ole Pete isn't taking his competition too seriously. Why should he when he has outraised his combined competition by 25 times?

Lyn vs. Euclid, Round 2
 

I said above, in musing on Lyn vs. Euclid, that I didn't know the provenance of the first LaRouche quote I cited there.

A longtime reader of this site has emailed me the following:

It's from a Sept. 17, 2009 LPAC piece titled "LaRouche: Long Term Cultural Conflicts Are Being Played Out Today" (what a novel thought)

http://www.larouchepac.com/node/11784

Thanks to the longtime reader. I'm not sure he would want his Factnet sobriquet used, so I am not printing it here.

But thanks.

LaRouche in Texas
 

On the Texas primary and Kesha Rogers, discussed above by Chator.

I have a feeling that Kesha's results will be a far cry from the highwater mark of LaRoucheism in Texas--the day in 1988 that LaRouche follower Claude Jones was sworn in as the chairman of the Democratic Party in Harris County (Houston), Texas--at the time the biggest Democratic county organization in the country.

Yes, we all remember that day (and if we don't, here's a news link to remind you http://www.nytimes.com/1988/04/12/us...l?pagewanted=1)

And, having just elected one of their number to the Harris County chairmanship, what did the org do? Take over the county? Use it as a springboard for further electoral successes in Texas? Organize around their "issues"?

If you picked any of those, you don't know Lyndon LaRouche.

Lyn positively, absolutely, 100% cannot tolerate competition.

He can't tolerate anyone stealing the limelight.

He has about as much self-control in that line as a 5-year-old on the playground--a really, really nasty 5-year-old.

So, what ever became of Claude Jones?

Why, he was shipped to Leesburg, where he got buried in the LaRouche A/V empire, working on ads or webcasts or LaRouche TV or ....

In short: No one ever heard of him again.

Same as what happened to Mark Fairchild and Janice Hart, after the 1986 Illinois primary everyone's reminiscing about these days (see Cohen, Scott Lee, Lt. Governor dropout, for details).

They had one moment in the sun, and then--they were vanished. Mark is somewhere in Pennsylvania these days.

Janice wisely left the org.

The bottom line is that if any NDPC or LPAC or "LaRouche Democrat" candidate ever got anywhere, he or she was deep-sixed.

Does anyone remember the NC meeting at the end of the 1990s (or maybe 2000?) when LaRouche announced that there would be no more candidates' movements, because the only candidacy that counted was his?

When the words "political genius" were first spoken, there appeared as a model laid up in the heavens for the just man to contemplate--an image of Lyndon LaRouche.

Based on current trends in fundraising, i would guess that all three LYM candidates will be soundly defeated by the incumbents they are running against. Keisha is the only candidate that could win her Democratic primary and make it to the general election. It would be interesting to see the reaction that comes from the Texas Democratic Party were that to happen.

As for your point about LaRouche not being able to stand anyone in his own movement becoming bigger than him, that raises the question of why he's running candidiates to begin with. I don't think Lyn is running candidates with the intention of having them win. Strategically, it makes no sense to run inexperienced candidates against political heavy-weights like Nancy Pelosi, and Barney Frank. He's also hedging against them, by giving them the platform of Obama's impeachement to run on. What Democrat in their right mind is going to vote for a candidate that will impeach the Democratic President? The choice of MA, TX, and CA, as states to run campaigns in makes more sense geographically, in terms of fundraising regions. Your Southern contacts get hit up to fund Keisha, your Eastern contacts get hit up to fund Rachel, and your Western contacts get hit up to fund Summer. So it appears as though the LYM are not running to save the world, but to save the cult!

The Last Hurrah. Again.
 

Of course Lyn is not running these people to have them win. Which is really just as well for him and them, inasmuch as they won't and can't.

But the difference between now and 1988, or even between now and 1999-2000, is that Lyn himself is not running.

As long as he was the perennial-presidential-candidate, he was less and less interested in any "candidates' movement."

Now that even he has realized that his days as a perennial-presidential-candidate are over--as he realized sometime in 2007--a "candidates' movement" can be used for the same things he used to use his own presidential campaigns for...

It gives the org something to write about, at least. Too bad they're nearly plumb out of publications.

mustache for Sarah
 

Larouche hasn't said much of anything about Sarah Palin's "Health Plan" as she rushes in to assume some sort of leadership role in the Tea Party...other than cuts in Medicaire and Social Security which would be dangerously closer to Schachtian austerity than anything Obama has proposed.

Claude Jones did have a sort of life for a wee bit of time. I may have posted a few times about a collection of Claude Jones posts on various news groups involving video production . These were very painful to read since they all started off with Claude entering a conversation about any topic and then bringing in Larouche in what was supposed to be an Adoration of the Lyn moment.

Instead, the participants would mock and ridicule Claude endlessly for being in a cult, or worshipping an anti semite or a criminal as well as a lunatic. The more Claude pushed Lyn , the more ridicule came at him to the point where he would be laughed at before he posted anything. After a few months of this, I never saw a google search engine mention of Claude.

I can't wait for the filings for these three LYMsters of donors. I would guess that there will be a high percentage of member donations. This is so Bizarro World in that we have a cult in the LYM/LC which raises several million dollars a year for a PAC and gives NOTHING to the LYM candidates. Please note this whomever is or will be studying the behaviour of this cult for your thesis. This is priceless!

Larouche Palooza 20101

-I don't know what it is about Seattle and the cult, but they sure drive people there to despise them with intensity. Seattle also has the best comments about the cult.

http://slog.thestranger.com/slog/arc...ma-hitler-sign


-I just thought of how much fun we have had and what we have accomplished here over the years. In the past, when you call Lyn a "Small Time Hitler" and point out the anti semitic lunacy , the cult responds by using a Trojan Jew to proclaim that they would not be here if there was anti semitism since they are Jewish. WIth this whole Bizarro World being a cult, they do not trot out someone to do the saem thing. In fact, I think the job is easier since the cult keeps on sending out goofy cult members to prove the point daily. We demand the the cult send out the cult daily to remind everyone of this.

http://www.wgil.com/localnews.php?xn...2010&newsid=88

-Laroucheisright jabroni talk.

http://lung-cancer-and.treatment-inf...-part-3-of-16/



-Here we have a hilarious section on just who Alex Jones is going to expose as a fraudster in thre world where his supporters reside. Is the cult doing a numbner on Tarpley? DOes David Icke still use cult info as his own.? This is a case where I guess only HH can sort out the crazy.



http://forum.prisonplanet.com/index.php?topic=158857.0






-What makes this worth posting is not just the Larouche topic, but that it features that great picture of Lyn with his bad teeth.
http://imagine2050.newcomm.org/2010/...-front-groups/



-You can play "The Larouche Card" in a book review as we see here.



http://www.ksorc.org/834-recovering-...tian-education





-The mass strike wins over the compuses.



http://www.tribalwar.com/forums/archive/t-605291.html



-What we learn hee is that the cult claims to have 50 LYMsters in the biggest LYM clubhouse. The cult can't explain anything which is the basic law of the LYM. We also see a correction at the end which is great.

http://www.lacanadaonline.com/articl...eople.0211.txt


-Here is a mention of the cult in the Wall Street Journal from the Behar show. We can see the carpet bagginf og the cult at work.



http://online.wsj.com/article/SB1000...DDLETopOpinion


-Here we find some Keesha Rogers news with some very funny moments.

http://halfempth.blogspot.com/2010/0...-opponent.html

-Some pictures of the cult in Seattle. I guess with no money for lit, there is no need for a card table shrine. This is like the old days when we carried our lit in one hand and just followed someone down the street.



http://photography-on-the.net/forum/....php?p=9593967





-Sarah Palin and Lyn? Obviously not a Palin fan.



http://www.nydailynews.com/forums/th...rt=40&tstart=0




After I write these posts I can't help but think back to that Campaigner we had with the article "Our Direct March to World Power". This is the current version for all of the LYM and LYMettes since the Campaigner is no longer published.

xlcr4life@hotmail.com

Breakdown Crisis
 

"It's a breakdown crisis," [LaRouche] concluded, "and they're all lying their heads off. And they're silly, on top of everything else!"

Indeed.

Sancho I can't tell if Lyn is talking about Boomer LCer or LYMsters who have flown the coop recently.

King has some interesting material to remind one of just how sick Lyn and the cult are.

http://lyndonlarouchewatch.org/larou...berg-judas.htm

http://lyndonlarouchewatch.org/larou...erg-judas1.htm


The other side of this is to think about how the cult has to accept this as their Gospel as part of a never ending descent into lunacy. Clinical studies indeed for our future thesis writers on cults, daily life as usual for the cult.

xlcr4life@hotmail.com

Is LaRouche economically literate?
 

I've been reading a chapter out of a book that describes and defines terminology used to describe economic phenomena. Based on that, i have to ask, Is LaRouche economically literate? Here are some examples;

Crisis: a brief period of acute disturbance in the business world, the prevailing features of which are the breakdown of credit and prices, and the destruction of confidence.

Crash/Collapse: used as descriptive of the sudden breakdown which marks the advent of a crisis

Depression: describes a condition of much longer duration than a crisis, or panic; and cannot be designated as financial. It pertains to industry and commerce, and includes the whole field of production and exchange.

Poverty: describes a permanent loss or abatement of prosperity.

If there is one term LaRouche abuses too often it is crisis, a real crisis is like the one Henry Paulson, Ben Bernake, and George W. Bush faced in September 2008. A crisis doesn't happen every couple of months for years on end, neither does a collapse. It seems Lyn often cann't make up his mind which adjective to use, so he uses them all, interchangably, with variation. The U.S. has not been collapsing for 30+ years, either it has been in a depression for that long, or it hasn't. BTW Depressions usually, historically, have not lasted that long.

The Pavlovian Crisis
 

The word "crisis" is one of those stimuli which set the LaRouchians salivating.

I know the so-called boomers are brain dead and biding their time waiting to die and be processed into Soylent Green crackers for Helga's mutts, but I cannot believe that after last year's October prediction failed miserably to materialize, there is a single person under the age of thirty remaining in the LaRouche organization.

Let's review: a tale of two arguments.

(1) Real World

Lyn said x would happen no later than y.

Months after y, still no x.

Lyn is wrong.

(2) LaRouche World

Months after y, still no apparent x.

But x did occur no later than y in some manner that escapes ordinary mortals.

Lyn said x would happen no later than y.

Lyn is right.

A brain under thirty should be plastic enough to snap out of (2).

*c r i s i s*

Neo-Nazis join the Party! Tea Party, that is.
 

While the corporate neo-cons try to capture from above the momentum of conservative political resurgance that was the grass-roots tea-party movement. Neo-nazis and anti-government "patriots" also want in.


Neo-Cons, Neo-Nazis And Neo-McVeighs Crash Ron Paul’s Tea Party

By Casey Gane-McCalla, February 16, 2010


The Tea Party, which started off as a Libertarian protest against taxes and government, has turned into a right wing, corporate sponsored, racist hate-fest. Three groups have joined the Libertarian founders of the Tea Party movement to add money, racism, hatred and conspiracy theory based paranoia to the Tea Pot.

The first group is the Neo-Cons. The same people behind the Bush administration have decided to use the Tea Party movement to put the Republicans back in power. They are doing this, using the former mouthpieces for the Bush White House, Fox News, Rush Limbaugh and conservative radio.

Neo-Cons like Newt Gingrich and Sarah Palin have had prominent roles speaking at Tea Party events, and Neo-Con pundits, Sean Hannity, Rush Limbaugh and Glenn Beck have been prominent cheerleaders for the movement.

Tea Parties are funded by FreedomWorks, which is run by Dick Armey. Armey is the author for the contract for America and was house majority leader for the Republicans during the nineties. He worked closely with Tom Delay and Newt Gingrich in congress.

The Neo-Con infiltration of the Tea Party is also known as astro-turfing. When well-funded political insiders try and pass off a well-orchestrated political movement funded by lobbyists as a grass roots, people’s movement it is called “astro-turing” (fake grass-roots).

The next group that has managed to infiltrate the tea party has been the Neo-Nazis. The white nationalists have seen the anger over a Black President and the mostly white make up of the tea party protesters and have decided to use the Tea Parties as a vehicle to spout their racist views and recruit new members.

Neo-Nazis speak openly about their involvement and support for the Tea Party movement on the White Supremacist Site, Stormfront. Here are some quotes from white supremacists regarding Tea Party events.

One thing I noticed about the Tea Party crowds is that they are 99% WHITE!
These are my people and they are your people as well. Just because they haven’t fully awakened doesn’t mean that they are our enemy. The polls on these people is that they do not support any (R) or (D) candidate, but instead support the person who is more constitutional.
My suggestion to all you do-nothings is that you join your local Tea-Party at make changes from within instead of criticizing from the outside. I love my fellow white neighbor and deep down these good Tea-partying white folks want the the basic same freedoms and rights as we all do. I say we establish ourselves in there before the filthy frikin joos do.
I don’t give 2 ****s about the RINO’s or the libs but the majority of the tea party people I’ve met are now at least willing to listen to the WN viewpoint. I’ve converted several of them (especially on the Jew issue) and the immigration issue is a no brainer.
I’ve attended a few of the Tea Party gatherings and have found quite a few racially aware folks in attendance. I use these gatherings to wake folks up to the ‘Jew’ problem in this country with many leaving say “Hmmm” and following up with me via email for further mentoring on the subject.There are people I met during the Ron Paul campaign who were “clowns”, and now are active White Nationalists. I’m not willing to pass up any opportunity I have to make more of them. It only takes me a few minutes a day to make either subtle or blatant racially-aware posts on forums filled with Tea Partyers. If I make even one new White Nationalist, it was worth it.

After a Neo-Nazi caused controversy by pulling out a Hitler flag at a Tea Party event, Neo-Nazis began commenting on Stormfront that White Nationalists should not use their Hitler and Swastika flags for fear of scaring off potential White Nationalist recruits because the Jews have sullied the image of their proud Fuehrer and the Swastika and instead should use Confederate Flags and “Don’t Tread On Me” shirts.

The Tea Party’s founder, Ron Paul has his own problem with white supremacist and Neo-Nazi supporters. Paul has received extensive support from Stormfront and other Neo-Nazi groups and has yet to distance himself from these Nazis groups, even taking a picture with Stormfront founder, Don Black and his son Derek. (see above picture)
Bill White, the commander of the Nazi group, has alleged that Paul’s ties to neo-Nazi groups are deeper than campaign contributions and photographs.

I am compelled to tell the truth about Ron Paul’s extensive involvement in white nationalism.
Both Congressman Paul and his aides regularly meet with members of the Stormfront set, American Renaissance, the Institute for Historic Review, and others at the Tara Thai restaurant in Arlington, Virginia
Paul is a white nationalist of the Stormfront type who has always kept his racial views and his views about world Judaism quiet because of his political position.

The last and perhaps most dangerous group to crash the Tea Party is the Neo-McVeighs. This group subscribes to many Neo-Con talking points and many members of this group subscribe to neo-Nazi beliefs but the Neo-McCveighs are characterized by militia based anger, a fierce devotion to high powered weapons an a strong belief in anti-government conspiracy theories. Another term for the Neo-McVegihs is the “patriot” movement.
The Neo-McVeighs believe in a New World Order conspiracy of a secret society that will turn the world into a one world socialist government while setting up concentration camps for dissenters and taking away the guns of true patriots in the USA.

Many of the Neo-Cons have adopted Neo-McVeigh code words to incite paranoia in the Tea Party. Sarah Palin has spoken about death panels, Glenn Beck has discussed FEMA concentration camps on his show and Pat Buchanan has openly talked about the New World Order, saying:

The West is disappearing into a New World Order, and against globalism, the Tea Party folks may represent our last best hope.

Right Wing Christian fundamentalist, Pat Robertson wrote a book the New World Order which was based on the Jewish/Mason conspiracy to take over the world.

One example of the Neo-McVeighs are the Oathkeepers, a group of militia based ex-military and policemen who have taken an oaths to not cooperate in the “New World Order.” One prominent Oathkeeper, Charles Dyer was recently arrested and charged with raping a seven-year-old girl. Authorities found a grenade launcher and explosives residue in his apartment. Here’s a quote from Dyer on the New World Order.

They’re trying to bring in the new world order and destroy our sovereignty. That means they are the domestic enemy I swore to defend and fight against to defend my constitution. And, I’m willing to put my life on the line to defend this country. And, I’m asking anyone who’s taken the oath to do the same.

The Neo-McVeighs have very similar ideologies and backgrounds to their namesake, Timothy McVeigh, who was responsible for the largest domestic terrorist attack in U.S. history. They both use a lot of pro-constitution and pro-gun rhetoric, often come from a military background and they are extremely anti-government and paranoid about a new world order.

Both Newsweek and The New York Times both wrote pieces about the high level of New World Order conspiracy theorists and the paranoia and anger they are creating in the Tea Party, claiming that “the party movement is dominated by conspiracy kooks” and that Tea Party court jester, Glenn Beck “frequently echoes Patriot(Neo-McVeigh) rhetoric, discussing the possible arrival of a “New World Order” and arguing that Obama is using a strategy of manufactured crisis to destroy the economy and pave the way for dictatorship.”

The Neo-Cons maybe creating a Frankenstein they cannot control with their constant funding and Fox News promotion of the Tea Party. The Neo-Nazis and Neo-McVeighs hold Neo-Cons in the same contempt as they hold the government. The Neo-Cons have tried to say the protests are against taxes, which is unlikely given that Obama has only proposed raising taxes on the riches one percent, which only applies to the Neo-Cons themselves not their followers and the Neo-Nazis and Neo-McVeighs.
The Neo-Cons differ greatly with the Libertarians, Neo-Nazis and Neo-McVeighs on foreign policy. While Neo-Cons strongly support Israel, believe in continuing the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq and starting a war with Iran, the Libertarians, Neo-Nazis and Neo-McVeighs are anti-Israel and against foreign wars.

The Libertarians have begun to speak out against the Neo-Cons. Will they speak out against the Neo-Nazis and the Neo-McVeighs? Will the Neo-Cons address the New World Order paranoia they are putting into the Teabaggers heads? Will anyone in the Tea Party stand up to the both blatant and subtle racism that the Ne0-Nazis and regular old racists are bringing to the Tea Party? Will the Neo-McVeighs turn on their Neo-Cons sponsors or create another Oklahoma City massacre? Is there any voice of reason in the Tea Party at all? If so I’d like to hear from them.

Source: http://newsone.com/nation/casey-gane...uls-tea-party/


Should Lyn and LYM be included as part of the Neo-McVeigh "Patriots"? Based on their rhetoric, perhaps they should be. Or maybe their proper categorization is in the Neo-Nazi white nationalist camp? Since they are still willing to brandish Hitler and Nazi imagery, while even the Neo-Nazis themselves are shying away from this.

Larouche Palooza 2010!



Our direct march to world power continues!!!!



-We have seen in the past where the cult's card table shrines have been called "Hate tables". If 1984 or Animal Far, are ever rewritten with Lyn and the cult in it, I see a cameo role for them. The article is funny in that we see an "information table" which gives no information when asked.



http://theguardsman.com/2010/02/laro...f-hate-speech/





-Some anger at the carpetbagging and kinship here.



http://www.texasgopvote.com/blog/cry...theories-02131





-http://www.rightsidenews.com/201002138654/politics-and-economics/friday-afternoon-roundup-the-fall-of-the-house-of-kennedy.html





-MySpace brings in the cult.



http://forums.myspace.com/p/4730645/...orums.viewpost





-More carpetbagging of the tea party.



http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/htm...eaparty16.html



http://the-reaction.blogspot.com/201...move-over.html







-Here is something with Lyn in the usual place.



http://againstcommies009.blogspot.co...hree-even.html





-Maybe this very long blog reprinting of a Paul Gallagher article is part of a plan to make Lyn a Saint when he dies? Does the Monk know the sins of Paul Gallagher and the prison time involved and if there was any attempt to right these wrongs against the vulnerable?



http://fatherdavidbirdosb.blogspot.c...gallagher.html



-We mentioned Summer, now we see a thread about Rachel's takeover.



http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/ne.../posts?page=12





-The cult gets a mention on a Soccer forum.



http://www.bigsoccer.com/forum/showt...php?p=19909530





-This is funny for the disclaimer. What is also interesting is that it looks like Lyn was cribbing from the NY Times. You can do this cheap parlor trick if you have a cult of nobodies who do not read or watch any news except what is fed to them.



http://forums.wallstreetexaminer.com...ode=linearplus




-I first laughed at this connecto jabroni, but this is what I was doing a few decades ago with the Rockefellers and what ever was the big news of the day. On the other hand, it is spooky that this jabroni is actually telling the truth about how bad the cult income is and the end of health ins for many members.



http://www.dirkbradshaw.com/?p=1322





-Lyn is supposed to be somewhere in the movie.



http://www.theamericanbookofthedead....ist-the-movie/



-When you read this PRAVDA forum notice the cartoon our Larouche Jabroni Tesla uses.



http://engforum.pravda.ru/showthread.php?p=3062366



-Lyn makes this blog and I smell a great button for the LYMsters to sell.



http://www.newstrib.com/articles/new...9EAA5C69773E5A





-What we have here is a person named "Topaz" who writes about "The Jews" and uses a 2004 Larouche press release for his proof .



http://groups.google.com/group/talk....225c975da94284



http://groups.google.com/group/talk....25c975da94284?





-While in the LYM, one must view themself as a "Larouche Organiser". In one article I read the cult member is not described that way, but as a "Larouche Disciple". Click here to see a happy disciple at a California Post Office.

http://theenterprisereport.typepad.c...7ab1e86970c-pi

"Tavistock Grin" anyone?


Also notice that this is one of many recent photos where there is no lit and thus no card table shrine to display bundles of Larouche Gospels. Is there something wrong in the fundraising?


http://theenterprisereport.typepad.c...as-hitler.html




-More evidence of taking over youth.



http://theoutlawjosie.blogspot.com/2...n-twitter.html





-Another example of a Larouche Jabroni (LOPM)meets the a search of Larouche.



http://www.topix.net/forum/world/cuba/TP871P36BTERTDVE3



-Doctor Webster Tarpley gets trapped by Lyn.

http://www.meetup.com/WeSurroundThem...hread/8594321/

-More cult play time in California and a very familiar theme about the cult.

http://www.newburyportnews.com/puopi...047223446.html


-More anger at the carpetbagging, or is it carpetbegging?

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-.../2453394/posts



-Hillarious picture of Keesha Rogers and funny comments.



http://juanitajean.com/2010/02/11/how-not-to-do-it/



http://www.democraticunderground.com...ress=180x62551

-Remember when we used to talk abut "Hegemony" in the LC? Lyn has achieved that.

http://forums.melodicrock.com/phpBB/...772bf84b4b03e0

-Using Lyn as an insult. what else is new?

http://www.thecitizen.com/~citizen0/node/42134



http://forums.thestranger.com/showthread.php?p=175287





It took a whole week to let this accumulate, but we find that Lyn and the cult are basically known for hate and laughter and carpetbegging.



xlcr4life@hotmail.com

http://www.rumproast.com/index.php/s...setts_primary/

Googly-eyed, Nazi-comparison machine Rachel Brown has “something to put on the table” in her bid to take down “Bailout Barney Frank” (catchy!) and impeach Barack Hussein Obama. It’s steamy and it attracts flies and sometimes she makes pictures out of it! Then she heads off to the LaRouche compound, eats fistfuls of graham crackers, and giggles about people’s “fart holes.” THE END.


Ahhh, a LaRouche Douche.

I expect Barney Frank to issue an apology—to Ms. Brown’s dining table for impugning its intelligence.
Comment by Allan on 02/18/10 at 08:37 AM


The funniest thing is that she apparently thought her encounter with Frank went well! It’s like the cavalry putting General Custer on a recruiting poster for the Indian Wars.
Comment by Betty Cracker on 02/18/10 at 08:51 AM


Dining Room Tables are now 75% Off in the Google ad sidebar.

This woman has totally crashed the market for brain-dead home furnishings.
Comment by StrangeAppar8us on 02/18/10 at 09:18 AM


Her website says she wants to impeach Obama for ending the NASA moon program?! That’s the meme?
Comment by David Stephenson on 02/18/10 at 09:30 AM


She says “here’s what I’ve got to put on the table” and then offers nothing but her name. A list of her psychoses would have been helpful.
Comment by Glix on 02/18/10 at 09:36 AM


@Polly—Ironically, she sounds like she’s getting most of her scientific notions here and here.

In any event, LaRouchies don’t really care about the noble adventure of space exploration. They just want the damned Helium-3 from the moon. They’re afraid the Chinese will get it first.
Comment by StrangeAppar8us on 02/18/10 at 09:52 AM

.................

Impeachable offenses
 

"The President, Vice President and all civil Officers of the United States, shall be removed from Office on Impeachment for, and Conviction of, Treason, Bribery, or other high Crimes and Misdemeanors." --US Constitution. Article II, Sec. 4.

According to the latest statements coming out of LYM and LYN; such as in Lyn's latest webcast, the most recent DWTT video, and the recent "Impeach Obama," video on LPAC; Obama's offense, for which he should be impeached, is cancelling NASA projects that intend to return man to the Moon within the next decade. This act of his is being touted as treasonous, and therefore an impeachable offense. Nevermind that space exploration was not even conceived of as possible when the U.S. Constitution was drafted. The LaRouchies could care less about the actual intent of this clause, they are not by any means, constitutionalists. Being constitutional to them means following dictator LaRouche's flights of fantastical interpretation of the U.S. Constitution, without ever reading the document itself to check that his logic is "on target." The U.S. Constitution to them, is really just another rabbit they pull out of their top-hat, in order to uuooo and ahhh, as they try to add some credibility to their insane ideas. Yes, LaRouche first announced that Obama should be impeached two months back, at his December webcast, in order to give his LYM candidates a platform they could run and lose on. But the real reason why Obama should join the ranks of Aaron Burr in the history books has now been revealed by prophet LaRouche. :D

Source: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4tJRgPDnqU8

Chator This is all so funny because I wrote several times in 2008 that it will be dejavu time for the cult based on what we did in the late 1970s. What Lyn does is to send the cult to forage where there is some anger. It does not matter what it is or what side of the political fence since he has a ready made supply of cheap parlor tricks to redirect everyone. Quicker then you can say "Connecto" the cult is busy phoning and deploying in new waters.



Lyn is just following the Jimmy Carter script where it also began with Lyn's 4 Horsemen of the Apocolypse.

-Nuclear war

-Economic collapse

-New Dark Ages.

-Nazis everywhere but in the mirror.


Lyn tries to outdo the right wing conspiracy people and calls for impeachment while trying to appear as friends of the right.This also works if you have the GOP in office as the cult went through 8 years of the same thing with Bush.

If you are a LYM or LYMette, doesn't it feel sort of goofy that we can pretty much know how your lives our determined?


Larouche Palooza 2010!



We start of with something to show just what Lyn's 330 million dollar delusion has produced for a legacy. I took the name of the guy who crashed a plane into a Texas office building and googled Joe Stack with Lyn.

Hee is what we got.


http://www.philly2philly.com/politic...ide_mission_ru



http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/2454327/posts


http://letters.salon.com/tech/htww/2...iew/index.html


http://shortformblog.com/chatter/pla...off-crazy-dude



http://74.125.47.132/search?q=cache:...&ct=clnk&gl=us



-Jakarta Larouche Jabroni or Billington contact or both?

http://www.thejakartapost.com/news/2...uns-world.html





-Ahhh the old days where our direct march to world power was based on battling the Krishnas and Moonies for card table shrine floor space at airports.


http://www.beyondchron.org/articles/...ower_7821.html





-Bad PR for the Tea Party. You should have fumigated them from your rallies.

http://timescheck.com/2010/02/18/tea...ndon-larouche/



-Little bit of Rachel here and some anger at the carpetbegging of the cult.

http://hillbuzz.org/2010/02/18/thurs...ary-18th-2010/




-Here we find a lot of Rachel "Dining Room Table" Brown. She could leave the cult and do a singing lounge act with that name in Biloxi before Vegas.



http://www.rumproast.com/index.php/s...setts_primary/





-Rachel has a release here which is funny in that Rachel may only have health coverage because she lives in Mass and not because but despite Lyn. Unless she has deluded herself into the ":Volunteer" section and the cult skips paying for her.



http://www.obamaconspiracy.org/2010/...er-candidates/





-More Rachel coverage on the web.



http://knowyourgovernment.wordpress....s-this-happen/





-Interesting writing about Lord Monckton and DDT where "The Larouche Method " is shown.



http://groups.google.com/group/alt.g...b2538d52f34cb6





-Lyn shows up in a physics forum.



http://groups.google.com/group/sci.p...e624e25fefa445





-This is something I have always thought about since reading the book "Bare Faced Messiah" about L. Ron Hubbard and noting how similar he and Lyn are. The LC/LYM and Scientology share a lot when you read that book and know our history. It is on the Washingon Redskins forum of all places and is based on a discussion of Scietnology as a religion vs a criminal emterprise. The person here is quoting from Scientology: Religion or racket? by Dr. Benjamin Beit-Hallahmi in the Marburg Journal of Religion.







http://www.extremeskins.com/showthread.php?p=7306871





xlcr4life@hotmail.com

The interesting bit in this essay...

http://www.themodernbeast.com/your-n...eadership.html

... is explaining why Larouche is not Martin Luther King, Jr.

... as though that weren't self-explanatory in any number of ways.

The Medium Is the Message
 

OK, I confess, I did spend time this weekend getting my news from LPAC-TV. (It gladdened my heart to hear that the word "Delphic" was still in circulation.)

Anyhoo, is enyone ever encouraged to visit the "boomer" site, www.larouchepub.com? Go there and note that, even if the grizzled elders are as fruity as their frumpy juniors, the site presents written words in recognizable attempts at rational discourse, whereas the LPAC site presents a complete poverty of content and intelligence in video format a la well-known creations of Orwell or Bradbury.

I did get a hoot out of the crossgenerational interchange between some cult cupcake and the bony erstwhile cult leader J. Philip Rubenstein. If anyone's satanic bona fides are in order, his are - but that did not prevent the youngster from mispronouncing his once legendary name. O tempora, o mores.

Reportedly, LPAC-TV presenters get their training at various children's museums throughout North America, such as

http://childrensmuseum.com/about-mcm/galleries/our-tv/

Have fun! And Ring Dings!