coral
08-14-2006, 03:15 PM
There are those who want information to be available to anyone checking out GGWO for the first time. I recently posted a link to carlstevens.org. on the Greater grace (external links) site on wikipedia. At first I posted it on the discussion page. Then I wrote to the editor of wikipedia at: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Contact_us
I thought that a link named Court Transcripts and News Media would be respected, as it is factual, documented information. It stayed there for two weeks or more. But it was erased last week, not only on the first page, but the History of my post was erased as well. Erasing history is an earmark of GGWO.
"Why would anyone want to attack ggwo?", the "author" asks. Well, there is still a link to the carlstevens site on the discussion page. It was not erased. So I am going to do what the editor suggests, and contact these people on the discussion page at:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Resolving_disputes
It would be nice to get a whole discussion going on the discussion page if anyone cares to join in.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Greater_Grace_World_Outreach
It would be nice to list GGWO under Christian Cults as well. I am not sure where to post GGWO, whether it should be in Cult or New Religious Movements. Any ideas?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/New_religious_movement
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cult
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cult_%28disambiguation%29
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Destructive_cult LOL!
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cult_of_personality
I think the New Reigious Movements has the most traffic.
I thought that a link named Court Transcripts and News Media would be respected, as it is factual, documented information. It stayed there for two weeks or more. But it was erased last week, not only on the first page, but the History of my post was erased as well. Erasing history is an earmark of GGWO.
"Why would anyone want to attack ggwo?", the "author" asks. Well, there is still a link to the carlstevens site on the discussion page. It was not erased. So I am going to do what the editor suggests, and contact these people on the discussion page at:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Resolving_disputes
It would be nice to get a whole discussion going on the discussion page if anyone cares to join in.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Greater_Grace_World_Outreach
It would be nice to list GGWO under Christian Cults as well. I am not sure where to post GGWO, whether it should be in Cult or New Religious Movements. Any ideas?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/New_religious_movement
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cult
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cult_%28disambiguation%29
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Destructive_cult LOL!
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cult_of_personality
I think the New Reigious Movements has the most traffic.