daved
09-30-2006, 11:36 AM
The title of this thread is: Is my questioning of the name "Yahweh" a "Public Lie" issue?
http://www.factnet.org/discus/messages/3/24643.html?1159581416
At the link above, Jim Buckley defined a catagory 2 public lie as:
<font color="ff0000">>>>
The public lie to discredit the teaching of Bible doctrine and those who communicate it.
>>></font>
Since at least 2000 A.D., Pastor Carl Stevens [ as well as other GGWO Pastors] has been teaching that God's name is "Yahweh".
In fact Pastor Carl Stevens has taught that even if a person had never heard his teaching that God's name is "Yahweh", that person would still be responsible for that teaching when they appear at the Bema Seat Evaluation.
I definitely have questioned the dogmatic teaching by Pastor Carl Stevens that God's name is "Yahweh", on this FACTNet GGWO Discussion Board.
Of course I was never aware until recently that I might be guilty of "a catagory 2 Public Lie".
However to be redundant Jim Buckley defines "a catagory 2 Public Lie" as:
<font color="ff0000">>>>
The public lie to discredit the teaching of <u>Bible doctrine</u> and those who communicate it.</font>
>>>
Since I assume that "Bible Doctrine" must be based on "the written Word of God", and since nowhere in "the written Word of God" is the name "Yahweh" found, <font color="ff0000">I wonder if in fact Pastor Carl Steven's teaching that God's name is "Yahweh" can legitimately be called <u>"Bible Doctrine".</u></font>
So technically any attempt by me to discredit Pastor Carl Steven's teaching that God's name is "Yahweh" may not be a catagory 2 "public lie",
<u>since the teaching that God's name is "Yahweh" does not appear be be based on the "written Word of God"</u>.
I am curious if by any chance Jim Buckley might think that Pastor Carl Stevens, himself, might be guilty of some sort of Public Lie, if in fact God has chosen not to preserve His Hebrew name as "Yahweh" in any extant Hebrew text.
Daved
http://www.factnet.org/discus/messages/3/24643.html?1159581416
At the link above, Jim Buckley defined a catagory 2 public lie as:
<font color="ff0000">>>>
The public lie to discredit the teaching of Bible doctrine and those who communicate it.
>>></font>
Since at least 2000 A.D., Pastor Carl Stevens [ as well as other GGWO Pastors] has been teaching that God's name is "Yahweh".
In fact Pastor Carl Stevens has taught that even if a person had never heard his teaching that God's name is "Yahweh", that person would still be responsible for that teaching when they appear at the Bema Seat Evaluation.
I definitely have questioned the dogmatic teaching by Pastor Carl Stevens that God's name is "Yahweh", on this FACTNet GGWO Discussion Board.
Of course I was never aware until recently that I might be guilty of "a catagory 2 Public Lie".
However to be redundant Jim Buckley defines "a catagory 2 Public Lie" as:
<font color="ff0000">>>>
The public lie to discredit the teaching of <u>Bible doctrine</u> and those who communicate it.</font>
>>>
Since I assume that "Bible Doctrine" must be based on "the written Word of God", and since nowhere in "the written Word of God" is the name "Yahweh" found, <font color="ff0000">I wonder if in fact Pastor Carl Steven's teaching that God's name is "Yahweh" can legitimately be called <u>"Bible Doctrine".</u></font>
So technically any attempt by me to discredit Pastor Carl Steven's teaching that God's name is "Yahweh" may not be a catagory 2 "public lie",
<u>since the teaching that God's name is "Yahweh" does not appear be be based on the "written Word of God"</u>.
I am curious if by any chance Jim Buckley might think that Pastor Carl Stevens, himself, might be guilty of some sort of Public Lie, if in fact God has chosen not to preserve His Hebrew name as "Yahweh" in any extant Hebrew text.
Daved