leon (leon)
10-06-2005, 09:25 PM
Day 1 "let there be light"= Big Bang
Day 2 mentions the "firmament" or atmosphere meaning that the stars and planets formed between day 1 and 2.
Day 3 mentions the waters being gathered together into one place and dry land showing up.The Earth WAS covered in water in the early days befor eland appeared.
Day 4 mentions God letting plants form (using the Sun and seasons) as the first life. Many Anti-Christians try and say "those stupid ancients though stars were created after the Earth". God only said "let" meaning that they were used by life for seasons and energy.Plus the ancients knew very well where light came from.If they said light was there on day 1 then they knew there was a sun either present or forming.
Day 5 mentions the first intelligent life being sea and water life then goes on to mention birds coming in relation to the sea life.Current evolutionary theory has life starting in the water then evolving out onto land through reptiles likfe Crocs , Amphibians, etc. Then Reptiles evolve into birds so say the evolution believers.
Day 6 goes on to give the relative order from day 5 with man being one of the LAST to be either created or evolved.
Genesis gets everything in the general order that the fossil record shows.Man was created (or evolved if you think the so called "evidence" for evolution is there) after animals were already here for a long time.
God shows how everything was created over various different periods.The order is what the scientific evidence shows. The sudden creation at different stages is what the scientific evidence shows.Evolution may or may not be a problem for creationism (depends,but Id say getting everything in the right order is most impressibe an unlikly for a work of man 3000 years ago,maybe things did evolve,doesnt hurt the Bibles recordings)but the scientific evidence sure is a problem for evolutionism.
Evolutionists loose every debate when the subject is evolution and evolution ALONE.Lets stop arguing the age of the Earth , and keep the burden on evolution in scientific debates.Keep the Bible out of scientific debates,only mention the correct order of Genesis with the scientific chronology of the Earth IF the evolutionist trys to pull a fast one and attempt to discredit the Bible (ie 6000 years stuff) to help hold up his own unscientific problems.
Day 2 mentions the "firmament" or atmosphere meaning that the stars and planets formed between day 1 and 2.
Day 3 mentions the waters being gathered together into one place and dry land showing up.The Earth WAS covered in water in the early days befor eland appeared.
Day 4 mentions God letting plants form (using the Sun and seasons) as the first life. Many Anti-Christians try and say "those stupid ancients though stars were created after the Earth". God only said "let" meaning that they were used by life for seasons and energy.Plus the ancients knew very well where light came from.If they said light was there on day 1 then they knew there was a sun either present or forming.
Day 5 mentions the first intelligent life being sea and water life then goes on to mention birds coming in relation to the sea life.Current evolutionary theory has life starting in the water then evolving out onto land through reptiles likfe Crocs , Amphibians, etc. Then Reptiles evolve into birds so say the evolution believers.
Day 6 goes on to give the relative order from day 5 with man being one of the LAST to be either created or evolved.
Genesis gets everything in the general order that the fossil record shows.Man was created (or evolved if you think the so called "evidence" for evolution is there) after animals were already here for a long time.
God shows how everything was created over various different periods.The order is what the scientific evidence shows. The sudden creation at different stages is what the scientific evidence shows.Evolution may or may not be a problem for creationism (depends,but Id say getting everything in the right order is most impressibe an unlikly for a work of man 3000 years ago,maybe things did evolve,doesnt hurt the Bibles recordings)but the scientific evidence sure is a problem for evolutionism.
Evolutionists loose every debate when the subject is evolution and evolution ALONE.Lets stop arguing the age of the Earth , and keep the burden on evolution in scientific debates.Keep the Bible out of scientific debates,only mention the correct order of Genesis with the scientific chronology of the Earth IF the evolutionist trys to pull a fast one and attempt to discredit the Bible (ie 6000 years stuff) to help hold up his own unscientific problems.