PDA

View Full Version : THE THEORY OF PAYTON PLACEDAYTIME SOAPS


david_munson
10-14-2006, 07:23 AM
<font color="000000"><font face="arial,helvetica"></font>
The title speaks for itself.
I have nothing to say ,,,except,
"have at it."


</font>}

kimberlyfredrick
10-14-2006, 07:55 AM
THIS is what you thought of at 2:23 in the morning???

you have sunk to an all-time low.

David, I thought better of you

smyrna
10-14-2006, 01:41 PM
Munsun,

Have you been hittin' the moonshine, brother?

kimberlyfredrick
10-16-2006, 09:08 PM
NOTE TO THE READER

This thread is STUPID!

kimberlyfredrick
10-16-2006, 09:31 PM
NOTE TO THE READER

Please refer to http://www.cultbusters.com for more information

smyrna
10-16-2006, 11:24 PM
Pretty funny Kim. But I say give Davey boy a break. He probably was hitting the bottle. Saturday night, a few brewskies with the boys,next thing you know, he's on Factnet stirring up the pot.

watchman_2
10-19-2006, 01:08 PM
Payton Place is where David gets his theology. It certainly is not from the Bible.

secure
10-19-2006, 02:44 PM
watchman, David munson, symra, kimberely all maybe the same person not for suer. Does that explain things.

angie0401
10-19-2006, 03:44 PM
Hey David &amp; watchman,
secure thinks you two are the same person! It's good to start your day with laughter!!http://www.factnet.org/discus/clipart/rofl.gif

kimberlyfredrick
10-19-2006, 06:07 PM
Hey Secure,

OK buddy you caught me red-handed......LOL

I started this thread over a year ago adding my own cast of characters I pulled otta a hat so to speak.

Dang, how did you ever find me out? I go by many names here and changed all the IP addresses.....buddy how did ya know???

You must be a friggin genius!!!

david_munson
10-19-2006, 07:13 PM
<font color="000000"><font face="arial,helvetica"></font>
With all the attention to symbolism,I am surprised that no one got the message.

It's a comment about what has gone on during the time this was posted.It was a soap opera extraordinaire at the time.
How did you folks miss that?

Come on now folks,think about it.

If such simple symbolism is not understood,how then can you be so sure of what you consider symbolic in scripture?

Just something to consider.
No reason to get upset.

Dave
P.S.
I do get a kick out of what Secure suggested.
It really is quite funny.


</font>}

kimberlyfredrick
10-19-2006, 07:42 PM
David,

You do realize you also are an actor on this stage...

david_munson
10-19-2006, 08:24 PM
<font color="000000"><font face="arial,helvetica"></font>
Kim,
of course I do.

The point was valid.
</font>}

kimberlyfredrick
10-19-2006, 08:31 PM
David,

lighten up man! I'm not against you!

And your right....Secure's comment WAS funny

david_munson
10-19-2006, 08:48 PM
<font color="000000"><font face="arial,helvetica"></font>
Kim,
at the time this post was made I was frustrated about all the name calling and accusations. So,I posted this to see if anyone would recognize what was going on and my method of addressing it.

I know you're not against me.
I'm not against you or anyone else here for that matter.
Just trying to bring peace in disagreement is all.

Lighten up?
Ok.
Hows this?
Maybe there should be a seperate thread entilttled "Spiritual UFC", the place for good carnal fighting.(good carnal?)<--Oximoron.http://www.factnet.org/discus/clipart/lol.gif
LOL.

Dave

</font>}

kimberlyfredrick
10-20-2006, 06:06 AM
Did anyone pick on the CB'ers coming over here EXACTLY when you guys start teaching me the Serpent Seed Doctrine???

We were also in a neutral discussion on the possible correlation between UFO activity and the Nephilim.

2 choices. If they truely wanted peace they would have joined in the Neplilim discussions. It had NOTHING to do with SC doctrine....Nothing.

We all could have researched and studied that topic together and maybe had a few laughs to boot.

Sad

godchild
10-20-2006, 11:08 PM
I'm responding here about the post's on the other thread (the bottom of the page was blocked so I couldn't post there).

What I said smyrna lied about was saying he didn't place his last post on the children's thread. You should have been able to see that from what I posted.

This had NOTHING to do with gone_to_pa's accusations or my posts about that situation. It was a different subject altogether. I never suggested that one of you put that letter on that other website, NEVER. I certainly didn't put it in gone_to_pa's mind. You are twisting things around. Now, I will wait for the letter smyrna said he would write and admit he lied about not putting that post on cultbuster.

I read the posts on that site (since many of us read it) and no names were named, only that someone said children were posting on cultbusters and talking to a 51 year old man (no names). Someone on that site said it was probably a pedophile site. Why gone_to_pa made that connection with anyone here is beyond me.

Don't try to drag me into this. What I said in defense of gone_to_pa was trying to clarify the situation. I didn't know gone_to_pa would come here. What I suggested to the members who had knowledge of this, after all this came to our notice was that adults not write on the children's pages, any adults, so that there would be no question about the purpose of the children's threads there. Some people don't think there is any harm in it, and I don't make the rules there.

godchild
10-20-2006, 11:48 PM
Note this was placed on the "URGENT PRAYER" thread:

smyrna
Jr. Member

Offline

Posts: 36


Re: Urgent Prayer
« Reply #216 on: October 16, 2006, 09:01:29 AM » Quote

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
"Hey, I just want to thank the space freak moderator at Cultbusters (you guys really don't do much real cultbusting, do you?) for closing the Arnold Murray/Shepherd's Chapel thread yesterday.

Now there will be one less place we Chapel students have to see all the ridiculous accusations, misrepresentations, and outright lies leveled at us.

I won't apologize for my beliefs, and anyone who thinks Murray is cult leader or that we students are cult members are idiots, pure and simple.

I especially don't see any reason for remaining on this so called cultbusting site, which seems to be populated by a bunch of freaked out cases of arrested development, who spend hours pretending they are cast members of a defunct science fiction TV show.

Senior cultbusters only get that title from the amount of drivel(posts) they spew on this site, and not any real cultbusting. How about taking a trip to 'Planet Reality' for a change?

You people are more cultish than any of the cults you claim to be busting.

Beam me up, Scotty!

terluvire
10-21-2006, 12:03 AM
<font color="0000ff">godchild,

Smyrna already admitted that he posted it on all the CB threads. So what's your point?</font>

kimberlyfredrick
10-21-2006, 12:04 AM
Godchild,

Please.....what website and when was the post written about the 'pedephile incident"?

I thought it was at Cultbusters?

How did Mitch confuss the author of that post with anyone here???

What is the correlation please?

smyrna
10-21-2006, 12:16 AM
Godchild,

Ok so what? I said I posted it all over the place at CB. I said I wanted to make sure everyone saw it.

I already admitted to that, and I'll also say now that I wanted to get banned from the sites, because with no SC thread, I really had no use for it.

I did write to admin., and since there was no room on the Notify link to offer a paragraph, I posted it to maybe some Mormom thread I think. Admin. replies on that very thread, and then I was banned, which was quite ok for me.

You should remember that, Godchild, you placed
applause emoticons after admin's comments to me.

But as a last post to everyone, focusing on the moderators, I pasted my final post all over. That it landed on a kid's thread really may be unfortunate. However, I doubt any of those kids, had they read it, would know what I was talking about anyway.

Besides that, aren't there any moderators there? They can't delete anything they wish? And don't they monitor their children, knowing that any website can be accessed by people that can harm them?

Don't they watch their own kids when they are on the Internet?

Sounds like they aren't, or they are making a bigger deal about my post hitting a kid's thread than is actually warranted. I said nothing that would harm a kid in any way.

Space Freak is the worst langauge, if you want to call it bad at all, in my post. Seems once again they make a big deal out of nothing.

smyrna
10-21-2006, 12:39 AM
He's lying Kimberly. I caught the contradiction and I posted it on the other thread.

He said first it was on Cultbusters. If you read carefully in the very next sentence he said it was on some "spero" website.

Wherever he said it was, he said it was deleted. No copy, no handle, no date even.

And since we can't ever trust what these people say, and thus they have no credibility that they or us can rely them to have, I would seriously doubt their accusations, as usual.

kimberlyfredrick
10-21-2006, 12:52 AM
I just googled 'Spero" and it is a Religious Forum for Baptist, Prodestants and Catholics. Way to many threads to check and no header to alert me to read it

This is all I got to say on the subject:

A serious accusation was made and a threat was given to every member of SC here on Factnet

No information was given as to why anyone of us was a suspect

We were not questioned, just presumed guilty

This is so wrong. I feel abused, threathened and yes lied to.

I reported this mess to Dan and Ghost yesterday. i am going to assume you all or will do the same

I for one will not live like this. Get this loud and clear I WILL NOT LIVE LIKE THIS

This is THE LAST TIME

If anything happens like this again I will put my Christian armour to the side and I will show you how us Southern ladies take care of busisness

You think you had one post to deal with, buddy you have not seen me in action

ANYONE comes over here and threatens anyone of us EVER AGAIN I personally will have a ball on this internet.


I will have peace in a peaceful way or I will fight to have it. Anyway, make a stand. I've made mine

'nuff said

kimberlyfredrick
10-21-2006, 12:54 AM
mitch,

You and your wife owe us an apology

angie0401
10-21-2006, 01:02 AM
kimberly,
I found a related post:

Ok, it took a google to find it, but here is the "Spero" site. It looks like the original thread has been deleted, but there is a thread started about the deletion that provides bits and pieces of what happened:

http://www.speroforum.com/forum/topic.asp?TOPIC_ID=3434&amp;whichpage=1


Now what really amazes me is that this all went down either middle of last week or the early part of this week. Why did big mitch suddenly decide it had something to do with us? Perhaps some troublemaker whispering in his ear??

At least one of the posters involved in the original thread even posts his ENTIRE name and website:

PabbyMan2000
Junior Member



57 Posts
Posted - 10/19/2006 : 11:12:20
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

I'd like an explanation from Admin as to why he deleted the entire thread. If all he was worried about were acusations of pedophilia then why not just delete the posts with those references? I resubmitted the topic with all pedophilia refereces deleted and he removed it again. So please explain to me what are the rules in regards to posts. This forum was set up to discuss cult claims. YWAM has been listed as a cult on many of the cult watch web sites. So was I wrong to put up a post about YWAM and their anti-Catholic activities? I am very much concerned that this cult is infiltrating the Catholic church. So if I said something wrong about YWAM then let's discuss that. What's the sense of having a forum if Admin is going to delete anything he doesn't agree with?

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Patrick J. Flanagan IV
Artistic Director
Living Miracle Productions
www.------.com (http://www.------.com)

Here's another poster in the drama:

denise
Junior Member



137 Posts
Posted - 10/18/2006 : 15:10:29
...I was completely surprised by Pabby's lack of ettiquette when he sent me an attachment and asked me to click it open to give him an "opinion", and when I did actually check the site related to the attachment in Google's cache (a relatively safe way to glimpse unknown sites) I gave him the simple and perfectly respectable opinion that hte site looked "risky" because it mixed adult content with adolescent and childre's material and especially role-playing, which is well-known to be like fly-paper for pedophiles. ...

And this was posted by mitch on the 17th, so why the sudden finger pointing at us??:

big mitch
New Member

USA
7 Posts
Posted - 10/17/2006 : 19:29:10
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

TO ADMIN,

THANK-YOU SO MUCH FOR BEING A PERSON OF YOUR WORD. IT IS RARE NOW-ADAY. WE MUST ALWAYS REMEMBER THAT OUR TONGUE IS A FIRE, A WORLD OF INIQUITY. LEFT UNCHECKED IT IS A AN UNRULY EVIL, FULL OF DEADLY POISON. ON THE OTHER HAND, THE WORDS OF THE RIGHTEOUS FEED MANY. I KNOW I'M NOT ALWAYS PERFECT, OR EVEN CLOSE FOR THAT MATTER, BUT I AM WORKING ON LETTING MY WORDS FEED THOSE TO WHOM I SPEAK. I STILL HAVE A WAYS TO GO, BUT WE ARE WORKING ON IT, THE LORD AND I THAT IS.

...


How mitch made such a leap is beyond me! BIZARRE!

kimberlyfredrick
10-21-2006, 01:09 AM
Once again, super-sleuth Angie to the rescue

Excellent job sista!


MITCH YOU AND YOUR WIFE OWE US AN APOLOGY

terluvire
10-21-2006, 01:20 AM
<font color="0000ff"><font size="+1">Thank you Angie!!!!</font> Big hugs coming your way sis!

I agree Kimberly, they definitely owe us a <font size="+1">huge apology!</font></font>