| Author |
Message |
   
Kari Sable
| | Posted on Tuesday, July 15, 2003 - 7:16 pm: |
|
Court TV missed it, The Smoking Gun missed it, so did the Enquirer, The Globe and all the others. Our crackerjack MacDonald expert investigator, Christina Masewicz and our resident writer and crime profiler John Philpin are responsible for getting this news to our list first! Please feel free to forward this post to message boards. Dr. and Mrs.? by John Philpin He was the best of the best a medical doctor, a Green Beret, the group surgeon at Fort Bragg, a ruggedly handsome soldier married to a loving woman who was soon to give birth to their third child. Then, something happened. The Jeffrey MacDonald case has spawned its own cottage industry books, articles, websites, and a battalion of true crime afficianados who have microanalyzed every nuance, every shred of evidence. More than three decades have passed since someone savagely murdered Collette Katherine MacDonald, five-year-old Kimberly Kathryn, and two-year-old Kristin Jean. Questions linger, opinions leave little room for a middle ground: Jeff MacDonald killed his family; intruders killed MacDonalds wife and two children, and assaulted the doctor. Take your pick. Story continued at: http://www.karisable.com/macmarried.htm |
   
Anonymous (142.176.14.228)
| | Posted on Wednesday, April 28, 2004 - 3:49 pm: |
|
ewwww, how could anyone marry that creep, baby killer MacDonald. |
   
Anonymous (66.248.50.181)
| | Posted on Wednesday, August 18, 2004 - 5:43 am: |
|
MacDonald is 100% guilty. That has been proven. For public and private documents, best resource site is The Jeffrey MacDonald Information Site (www.thejeffreymacdonaldcase.com). See for yourself why this triple murderer was so rightly convicted. |
   
Anonymous (66.248.50.181)
| | Posted on Wednesday, August 18, 2004 - 5:52 am: |
|
Not to mention ALL THOSE LIES he has told for years. No doubt about it, all the evidence points directly to him and no one else. Have you seen MacDonald's Magical Mystery Tour...it's mind-boggling, how much he lies! Check out www.themacdonaldcase.com - if you still believe he's innocent after seeing the MMT, I have a bridge I can sell you, cheap... |
   
Anonymous (69.208.223.244)
| | Posted on Sunday, August 22, 2004 - 7:33 pm: |
|
I have one doubt concerning McDonald's guilt. The girl in the floppy hat that McDonald told the MP's about the night of the murders. The MP's saw her on the Fort Bragg property on the way to McDonalds house at 3:00 AM in the pouring rain. The MP's said they would have stopped and questioned her if they were not on an emergency call. Was she there at McDonald's house that night like he says? |
   
Anonymous (66.248.50.173)
| | Posted on Sunday, August 29, 2004 - 3:00 pm: |
|
Through the plastic windows of his jeep, MP Kenneth Mica saw a woman in a raincoat standing on a street corner. She was alone. MacDonald's website deliberately lies about this woman, claiming that she was identified as Helena Stoeckley. The truth is that the woman was never identified. No, Helena Stoeckley was not in the apartment that night, nor has anything ever surfaced to show that she was ever there. At trial, she denied having any part in the murders. On another occasion, this poor drug-addled woman said she was there, and saw MacDonald himself committing the murders. Keeping in mind that this is just ONE of MANY pieces of evidence against MacDonald, MacDonald claimed that he was wearing his pajama top when he went to sleep on the sofa, that he was attacked as he slept, that he fought with intruders, and that he fell unconscious in the hallway, the pajama top still on his body, torn and wrapped around his wrists. But it was proven beyond any doubt that his wife Colette's blood was on the pajama top in massive quantity, and that this blood was put there BEFORE the top was torn. MacDonald cannot explain this away, just as he cannot explain away any of the other damaging pieces of evidence against him. No conclusive physical or circumstantial evidence ever surfaced to show that any intruders were in the apartment that night. On the contrary, the evidence was overwhelming against MacDonald. That, combined with his countless lies about what happened, and the constant changing of his stories as he learned of the evidence, resulted - quite rightly - in his serving three consecutive life sentences for these brutal crimes. |
   
Anonymous (66.248.50.77)
| | Posted on Saturday, September 11, 2004 - 5:15 pm: |
|
I found the true facts of this case at www.thejeffreymacdonaldcase.com and www.themacdonaldcase.com and it really helped me to make up my mind. Jeffrey MacDonald was a narcissistic sociopath who had no regard or concern for anyone. He murdered his wife and two small children, there's a good possibility that he was molesting his older daughter, he tried to cover everything up afterwards, and failed miserably because the vast amount of evidence completely contradicted his accounts of what happened. I'm glad he is in prison and hope he stays there for the rest of his life. |
   
barb New member Username: barb
Post Number: 1 Registered: 7-2007 Posted From: 75.3.241.24
| | Posted on Sunday, July 22, 2007 - 4:59 pm: |
|
I watched the "48 Hours" story last night and the only thing that raised any doubt for me was the fact that the MPs saw the woman in a floppy hat. But then I realized, if they saw her, then McDonald probably saw her outside too and incorporated her into his story. Crazy people are always confessing to crimes they didn't commit, just like that nut who said he killed JonBenet Ramsey. She said she couldn't ride the rocking horse because the spring was broken but that was disproved by crime-scene pictures showing the spring was not broken. She was making up stuff. No way that mangy group of murderers were in that house and didn't leave behind anything except one blonde wig hair. That hair could have been from the Avon lady or from a doll that the girls played with at the store or at a friends house. He's guilty and that woman who married him is a nut too.} |
|