| Author |
Message |
   
pickled_sausage Intermediate Member Username: pickled_sausage
Post Number: 116 Registered: 9-2005 Posted From: 65.93.80.192
| | Posted on Thursday, September 14, 2006 - 5:08 pm: |
|
Hi Jimmy...have you been on the receiving end of one of these taser blasts? If not, why the interest? |
   
gatordave Senior Member Username: gatordave
Post Number: 1787 Registered: 11-2004 Posted From: 72.38.117.34
| | Posted on Friday, September 15, 2006 - 8:07 am: |
|
It could be he has a civic interest. That is, a general concern for others that goes beyond "If-it-didn't-happen-to-me-why-should-I-give-a-damn" common Canadian "head in the sand" attitude. dave www.crimebustersnow.com |
   
pickled_sausage Intermediate Member Username: pickled_sausage
Post Number: 117 Registered: 9-2005 Posted From: 69.156.153.6
| | Posted on Friday, September 15, 2006 - 4:58 pm: |
|
Or it could be that the notion that our government has been developing this "sinister" technology in secret is utterly ridiculous. I think I'll pop my head back in the sand so my noggin is protected from these harmful rays....lest I become dim. |
   
gatordave Senior Member Username: gatordave
Post Number: 1788 Registered: 11-2004 Posted From: 72.38.117.34
| | Posted on Saturday, September 16, 2006 - 12:53 am: |
|
Yes “P-S” aka "P.Brain," your proposition could be quite correct. But there were those who poo pooed for years the rumours of a fighter jet that was invisible to radar at the same time the government denied it. There are those, and you certainly seem to fit the profile of one, who proposes nothing exists and no crimes are committed by police and government, and government is not involved with, nor influenced by organized crime until the indisputable evidence is "shoved in your face" “down your throat” or "hits you over the head." A detective in my view, you would never make. You seem to disregard everything until the police or government is forced to admit it. Secret C.I.A. Prisons etc.: facts, figures, evidence, sound mathematics even that which is self evidence you appear to disregard until, like the Gormey Inquiry you are unable to deny it further. You seem incapable of putting facts together or thinking for yourself and without valid argument strike down as not credible the thousand of hours other spend investigating. The way one arrives at the truth is to search for independent evidence continually testing and retesting not only what other are proposing, but your own facts and therories and not just "as you indicate" pop you head out of the sand for a few minutes or take you eyes off the sports channel just long enough to ridicule and attempt to discredit others who have spent years investigating accusing them of not knowing what they’re talking out. Now when you consider what has been on T.V. from reputable research facilities and published in reputable journals etc., (but I forget for a moment that you’re probably glued to the sports channel) with respect to a “chip” slightly larger than a grain of rice that can quickly and easily be implanted into the body with a large needle: a chip, having the capability to transmit a code that can “unlock” any information contained in computer files; i.e. social insurance, medical, personal information and the like. This is available today. So, you may want to rethink, your skepticism based upon the available technology and what is being exposed currently and then consider what is being secretly developed right now that will not be confirmed for years, if ever. Perhaps you could, as you say “pop your head back in the sand” and this time leave it there so you don’t risk confusing those searching for the truth into believing, with your modicum or non existent research, that you may actually know what you’re talking about. And also as you wrote, “so your noggin is protected” which in my view, not “lest you become dim” as you espouse, but rather dimmer!!! Which seems to be what has happened to you since the last factual battle we engaged in. |
   
doug Senior Member Username: doug
Post Number: 1095 Registered: 11-2004 Posted From: 72.68.3.205
| | Posted on Saturday, September 16, 2006 - 2:54 pm: |
|
Gerry D's proposal is not so far fetched. The motive always exists, history and the present prove that. As far as technology, over 10 years ago I knew a 12 yr old who built microwave devices that he could point at a window 300 feet away and hear everything said in the room. At that time the FBI had one that ranged 3 miles. In Japan many children had seizures from watching peoples eyes spin on a cartoon. There are sound waves that can make people vomit. You can point devices at people to selectively hear what they are saying and not be drowned out by the ambient noise and all this is common knowledge for some time now. Common sense tells us that much more than we see exists. It's like relativity. Every motion is defined by a relative stillness. If you carry it to its end there is an ultimate stillness that is undefinable yet defines all motion. You know it exists even though you can't see it or define it. |
|