| Author | Message | ||
     NewsSnoop |
From: Cult News.com: "New Age Psychiatry" Address:http://www.cultnews.com/archives/000570.html Changed:9:40 AM on Monday, May 26, 2003 The doctor admits he has studied with "Rajneesh, Shirley McLaine, Kevin Ryerson, Edgar Cayce, Ramtha, and Yogananda." These controversial sources are hardly what medical doctors would typically rely upon to form any clinical opinion. And it certainly is questionable that any mental health professional would base an opinion on such specious and subjective and sources. MORE | ||
| Anonymous |
I see ALL psychiatry as pseudo-scientific. Renegade shrink, PR Breggin, correctly says we have a "medical / pharmaceutical complex". No one can PROVE anyone's DNA caused them to become depressed. Shrinks lie everyday, telling people they have endogenous depression and/or chemical imbalances. The only accurate thing they should say is , "We don't know yet." The jury is out. OCD's opposite is DOC, delusions of certainty. Question ALL mental health professionals, social workers included. They have one another brainwashed. As George Bernard Shaw said: All the professions are conspiracies against the laity. | ||
| Douglas (68.162.56.168) |
Professionals are the easiest ones to hypnotise. It has to do with their learning process. You can hypnotise them easieer than the average person to do the most idiotic things and they are the idiots running this world. Many psychiatrists use hypnotism, which is the problem, to try to solve problems. Rather than properly through concious awareness and healing truth following the present symptoms to their root they hypnotise a person to relive a trauma. The person becomes retraumatised and gets worse. The psychiatrist blames it on the trauma and puts the person on medications and has a patient for life or until possably committed to an institution if they run out of money. | ||
| obnoxious me (199.174.250.115) |
HUH? Mainstream psychiatry and psychology progresses hand in hand with medical practice/research. Only poor medical care relies on drugs alone to treat depression. As far as hypnotism, I hate to tell ya, but if it's that stop-smoking hypnotist near the 7-11, it ain't a real shrink. | ||
| prschuster (prschuster) New member Username: prschuster Post Number: 7 Registered: 11-2004 Posted From: 67.4.177.98 |
I am very suspiscious of psychopharmaceuticals at this point, especially when they are routinely used for people with affective disorders who are not psychotic. Affecting the levels of neurotransmitters in the brain is way too nonspecific. Every pathway involved with the neurotransmitter is switched on or switched off. The specific issues that the individual has aren't addressed with this general approach. Feelings are blunted so that the person can't learn to deal with them and mature emotionally. I have had the erie feeling around some people on medications that they were relating emotionally to the chemical in their brains, rather than to circumstances in the outside environment. The fact that people get habituated to the meds so the dosage has to be periodically readjusted, also concerns me. It is never pleasant to see someone develope tardive dyskinesia after several years of medication. Peter Breggin said it more succinctly when he referred to these medications as "chemical lobotomies". You can call me skeptical at this point. | ||
| anonym1 (anonym1) New member Username: anonym1 Post Number: 1 Registered: 8-2005 Posted From: 84.32.56.97 |
Klik here,thiss the site translate story about psychiatric hospital. http://www.translate.ru/url/tran_url.asp?lang=ru&url=http%3A%2F%2Fpsychiatrysait.freespaces.com%2F&direction=re&template=General&cp1=NO&cp2=NO&autotranslate=on&transliterate=on&psubmit2.x=48&psubmit2.y=16 |
