| Author |
Message |
    
Priddy
| | Posted on Wednesday, July 23, 2003 - 5:02 am: | 
|
After up to 20 years involvement with Sathya Sai Baba, not least as the leader of his organisation in Norway, I came to learn dark secrets about him and his ashrams. This led to further investigation and my defection from what I now regard as a highly secretive cult. What I learned about Sathya Sai Baba, his movement and the extremely subtle kind of brainwashing involved is described in full on my website at http://home.no.net/anir/Sai/enigma/ Thanks, Robert |
Anonymous
| | Posted on Monday, August 11, 2003 - 6:39 am: |
|
Sai Baba is a master crook and pedophile.. His organization has killed many people within his own campus...
He controls politicians in India including the current 'missile man' president Kalam |
Anonymous
| | Posted on Thursday, August 14, 2003 - 2:43 am: |
|
Mr Priddy,
Even though you oppose Sai Baba, why did you stay with him 20 long years? Why did it take so long to realize that no one can perform miracles today in this World?
You and people like Conny Larsson are gullibles of the West who mistakenly thik Sai Baba is representing the INDIAN culture or philosophy...
Conny Larsson came out opposing only when Saia Baba started harrassing / misusing Conny's own son!!!
Several sensible people had exposed Sai Baba in the 70s and 80s... |
Anonymous
| | Posted on Friday, November 14, 2003 - 11:16 am: |
|
Tescos supermarket online store here in the uk sell a lot of books about Sai Baba.
Why would one of the biggest supermarket chains in the UK market books about a Guru...interesting list. At least one book is written by a former member of the group.
See
http://www.tesco.com/books/frames.htm
you may have to do a search on this page for Sai Baba but there are quite a few pages there |
Anonymous
| | Posted on Friday, November 14, 2003 - 4:04 pm: |
|
Sorry I forgot about this posting. The reasons why I stayed so long with Sathya Sai Baba are very complex and unusual. I experienced many genuinely paranormal phenomena in this connection, inexplicable by any known science. I wrote a book about it (Source of the Dream, published in USA, India & Brazil), and much of that is still valid, though I was unaware of the things that were kept so secret that hardly anyone discovers them... and those who do are mostly powerless to break with this mosy subtle and insidious of deceits... one which also stands for many things we consider good (social works, healings etc. etc.) Robert Priddy |
Anonymous (216.46.66.114)
| | Posted on Sunday, May 09, 2004 - 8:16 pm: |
|
How do they recruit members and what is the age range? |
joe108 (joe108)
New member
Username: joe108
Post Number: 1
Registered: 11-2004
Posted From: 4.240.144.252
| | Posted on Saturday, November 06, 2004 - 2:01 pm: |
|
The BBC Documentary, Secret Swami, is riddled with many serious problems. For example, the "GuruBuster", Basava Premanand, makes a bold assertion that Sathya Sai Baba was a witness to the murders. Despite having NO evidence to back this up, Tanya Datta and the BBC Investigators, did not ask for Basava Premanand's "evidence". Furthermore, the BBC Documentary does not provide us with Basava Premanand's credentials. Basava Premanand wrote a book called "Murders in Sai Baba's Bedroom" that provides "evidence" against SSB. What is the evidence? Newspaper clippings! You can read about this on my site at: http://www.vishvarupa.com/Fair-Is-Fair/Ex-Baba.com/Murders/murders-basava-premanand.html
Furthermore, Basava Premanand, being highly scornful on the profit making at SSB's ashram, charges 300% more to foreigners for his book, as opposed to the price he charges to non-foreigners!
One of the most persuasive testimonies in the BBC Documentary is that of Alaya Rahm (also known as Sam Young). However, The BBC Documenatary does not provide us with the following facts regarding Alaya Rahm's (Sam Young's) previous testimonies that directly contradict his testimony on Secret Swami. For example:
The testimonies of Sam Young are listed on three sites: 1) Divine Downfall, by Mick Brown, October 27th, 2000, in the Daily Telegraph, UK; 2) Seduced, Danish TV Documentary aired January 30th, 2002; and 3) Secret Swami, BBC Documentary aired June 17th, 2004.
The testimonies of Sam Young are listed on three sites: 1) Divine Downfall, by Mick Brown, October 27th, 2000, in the Daily Telegraph, UK; 2) Seduced, Danish TV Documentary aired January 30th, 2002; and 3) Secret Swami, BBC Documentary aired June 17th, 2004.
There are some serious contradictions, in these three testimonies, that need to be addressed.
Sam Young’s First Experience: Contradictions:
In Sam Young’s testimony, from Seduced, Sam Young claims that his first personal experience with SSB occurred, when he was 16 years old, when he went to see SSB, alone with some friends in a USA group. His family did not accompany him during this trip. According to Sam Young’s testimony, on Seduced, SSB materialized oil and rubbed it on his testicles and kissed him deeply and it seemed as if SSB was trying to make his penis erect [Seduced: 217 00:29:46:24 00:29:53:22].
This testimony directly contradicts the testimony that Sam Young gave in Secret Swami, in which Sam Young said that his first personal experience with SSB was when his family was with him in 1997 [Secret Swami: 10.16.47 & 10.18.38]. According to Sam Young, on Secret Swami, his family was called for an interview (in 1997) and he was called privately. It was then that SSB materialized oil and rubbed it on his testicles and kissed him deeply [Secret Swami: 10.18.51]. After the interview, his father, Al, asked Sam what happened in the private interview. Sam said he could not tell. Al asked if SSB made oil for him. Sam asked Al how he knew about the oil and Al said that it had happened to him too. Al accepted the experience as some sort of healing ritual [Secret Swami: 10.19.13].
The previous two accounts contradict Sam Young’s testimony, in the Divine Downfall interview, that he had with Mick Brown. According to the Divine Downfall interview, "In 1995, Sam had come to his father. In a private interview, he said, Sai Baba had 'materialised' some oil in his hand, unbuttoned Sam's trousers and rubbed his genitals. Jeff (This is Al. Names change for anonymity. For example Sam Young is Alaya Rahm) told his son he had had a similar experience when he first met Sai Baba at 18. 'I said to Sam, what did you think about it? He said he didn't feel there was anything sexual about it; it was like Sai Baba was doing his job. And I'd kind of had that experience. A doctor gives a boy an exam. I'd taken it as some kind of healing.' Thereafter, Sam said nothing about his experiences". Sam Young makes no mention of SSB kissing him deeply and trying to make his penis erect (as he claimed in Secret Swami and Seduced). As a matter of fact, Sam Young told his father that, "he didn’t feel there was anything sexual about it; it was like Sai Baba was doing his job".
Sam Young’s Oiling. When did it happen and who was told: Contradictions:
In the Divine Downfall interview, Sam Young received an oiling from SSB, in 1995, in a trip he took with a family friend (Family did not go with Sam on this trip). After receiving this oiling, Sam Young told his father about it when he returned to the USA (in 1995).
In Seduced, Sam Young received an oiling from SSB, when he was 16 years old, in a trip he took with friends in a USA group (Family did not go with Sam on this trip). After receiving this oiling, Sam Young told no one, as directed by SSB. Sam Young went back to see SSB, with his family, in 1997. The family was called for an interview. Sam Young was called for a private interview but he does "not remember exactly what happened", but claims that "physical contact" occurred. [Seduced: 217 00:29:46:24 00:29:53:22].
In Secret Swami, Sam Young received an oiling from SSB, in 1997, in a trip he took with his family [Secret Swami: 10.16.47]. In this family interview (in 1997), Sam Young received a private interview and had an oiling. SSB kissed him heavily on the mouth. SSB told him to tell no one. After the interview, his father, Al, asked Sam what happened in the private interview. Sam said he could not tell. Al asked if SSB made oil for him. Sam asked Al how he knew about the oil and Al said that it had happened to him too. Al accepted the experience as some sort of healing ritual [Secret Swami: 10.19.13]. This directly contradicts Sam Young’s Seduced account in which he says, of his 1997 family interview, "I don’t remember exactly what happened that first day, but I know that there was physical contact in the personal interview room" [Seduced: 217 00:29:46:24 00:29:53:22].
Other Contradictions:
In Sam Young’s testimony on Divine Downfall, we have a revelation that Sam Young had received about $10,000 in cash and gifts from SSB. On Secret Swami, Al Rahm said, "I think he gave him several thousands dollars". Al Rahm "thinks" SSB gave Sam "several thousand dollars"? Why didn't he ask him? Where did this figure of $10,000 come from? Especially in light that the Rahm family claims that the gold watches and diamond rings, that they received from SSB, were cheap and not worth very much money. There is no mention of Sam receiving any amount of money on Seduced.
Another contradiction occurs between Sam Young’s testimony in Divine Downfall and Seduced. In Sam Young’s testimony, on Seduced, Sam Young claims that he had conversations with "other people" who had similar experiences. Sam said he could talk more openly with them than he could with his dad [Seduced: 226 00:36:34:10 00:36:38:15]. However, in Divine Downfall, the "other people" are two American, teenage students at the Puttparthi College. In Divine Downfall, Sam Young said that "we didn’t talk about it too much because of the idea that he (SSB) was omniscient, that he’d know what we were talking about and what was in our heads". In Seduced, Sam Young talks to other people (notice he does not specify the important information that they were American, Sai Students) and he talks to them openly [Seduced: 226 00:36:34:10 00:36:38:15]. Yet in the second account, on Divine Downfall, they "didn’t talk about it too much". So, did Sam talk "openly" about it or "not too much"?
The last contradiction is regarding the accounts given in Divine Downfall and Secret Swami about how Sam Young divulged everything that was happening to his parents. In Divine Downfall, it states, "When Sai Baba attempted to get him to perform oral sex, Sam walked out for the last time, although it would be some months before he summoned the nerve to tell his parents". This same story is repeated in Seduced in which it said that Sam Young told his father [Seduced: 227 00:38:26:03 00:38:29:06]. However, in Secret Swami, Sam did not tell his parents. His parents confronted him and that was when he divulged the story. In Secret Swami, it says, "Al Rahm: We were concerned about Alaya’s behaviour and the way he was acting and so we decided we were going to confront him. Well, to my surprise when Alaya said ok and he started to tell the story, it was so much more than I knew anything about" [Secret Swami: 10.35.20].
Consequently, the BBC Documentary, Secret Swami, that is the Holy Grail for those who are anti-SSB, has been shown to be riddled with inconsistencies, contradictions and has been poorly researched.
Will Tanya Datta or David Savill make the necessary inquiries to rectify these contradictions and supply the general public with the crucial information they need to better assess this documentary? No one knows. Contact David Savill at: david.savill@bbc.co.uk and make your voice heard.
In Seduced, the Denmark Documentary, another key witness, Jed Geyerhahn, provides two completely different testimonies as to what happened to him:
Did Jed Geyerhahn lie? Jed Geyerhahn’s testimony is published on two different pages on ExBaba.com. One under "Witnesses" and the other under "Articles" in the Seduced article.
On Jed Geyerhahn's Witness Account, Jed says, "This brings me to my very questionable experiences with Sai Baba. On my second trip to Sai Baba I had four interviews. Each time I saw Baba, his hand would gradually make more prominant connections to my groin. The first interview was a slight swipe, the second a definite touch and the third time he grabbed me and with a very stern face looked me directly in the eye and said "you are very weak!" Needless to say, he scared and embarassed me. I was guilt ridden to have sexual passion, though I was a healthy 16 year old boy, a testosterone machine. I was not going to talk to anyone about the experience. In the final interview he asked me to take my pants down. I was totally confused, so he took them down for me. He then made vibhutti and rubbed it on my genitals. On my third trip, he did the same thing, but rubbed oil on my genitals. Fortunately, I was never taken advantage of any worse, but I was humiliated when I realised his true intentions, and I felt I had really lost an innocence that I would have cherished keeping."
On Jed Geyerhahn's Seduced Account, Jed says, "In 1989 when I was 15 years old I went to India for three weeks. And on that trip I had four interviews. And in the third interview he actually asked me to untie my pants. And he forcibly pulled my pants down and with his bare hand grabbed my groin and rubbed some oil on the side of my scrotum. And I went again on the following year, and on that trip when I was 16 years old, SB called me again for a private interview. At that point I was even actually more uncomfortable because it seemed like this had already taken place, there is no reason why it needed to take place again. But he asked me to take my pants down. I did and he went on and produced an oily substance and rubbed it on the side of my scrotum."
Jed Geyerhahn’s Witnesses Account states that: 1) On his second trip to SSB, he got four interviews when he was 16 years old; 2) First Interview, Baba swiped his midsection; Second Interview, a definite touch; Third Interview, a forcible grab and in the Fourth Interview, SSB took down his pants and rubbed vibuthi on his genitals; 3) On his third trip, SSB rubbed oil on his genitals.
Now, if we look at Jed Geyerhahn’s Seduced Account, we have a different story. 1) On his first trip to SSB, he got four interviews when he was 15 years old; 2) First Interview, no account; Second Interview, no account, Third Interview, he forcible pulled down his pants and rubbed oil on the side of his scrotum and there are no comments about the Fourth Interview. 2) On his second trip, when he was 16 years old, SSB rubbed oil on the side of his scrotum.
Consequently, Jed Geyerhahn completely contradicts himself in his Witness and Seduced testimonies. On Jed Geyerhahn’s Witness account, he says he had four interviews on his second trip to SSB when he was 16. On his Seduced account, he says he had four interviews on his first trip to SSB when he was 15. On Jed Geyerhahn’s Witness account, in his fourth interview, SSB rubbed vibuthi on his genitals. However, on Jed Geyerhahn’s Seduced account, in his third interview, SSB rubbed oil on his genitals. In this same account, on Seduced, Jed Geyerhahn said that it was on his second trip, not his third, when he was 16 years old, when SSB rubbed oil on the side of his scrotum. How can we believe Jed Geyerhahn when his testimonies completely contradict each other?
Witness Info: http://www.vishvarupa.com/Fair-Is-Fair/Ex-Baba.com/Witnesses/exbaba-witnesses.html
The Findings Info: http://www.vishvarupa.com/Fair-Is-Fair/Ex-Baba.com/Findings/exbaba-findings.html
Online Petition Info: http://www.vishvarupa.com/Fair-Is-Fair/
1993 Murders Info: http://www.vishvarupa.com/Fair-Is-Fair/Ex-Baba.com/Murders/exbaba-murders.html |
joe108 (joe108)
New member
Username: joe108
Post Number: 2
Registered: 11-2004
Posted From: 4.240.144.252
| | Posted on Saturday, November 06, 2004 - 2:03 pm: |
|
If you want to read about Robert Priddy's 3 year investigation into the murders that occured in 1993 and how poorly he actually researched it, view my page at: http://www.vishvarupa.com/Fair-Is-Fair/Ex-Baba.com/Murders/murders-robert-priddy.html |
priddy (priddy)
New member
Username: priddy
Post Number: 1
Registered: 12-2004
Posted From: 80.111.201.215
| | Posted on Friday, December 03, 2004 - 9:38 am: |
|
The whole point of the Sathya Sai Baba murders issue is that they were never properly investigated, but covered-up and quashed, as everyone knows. Therefore, attempts to investigate all the details are bound to reach some dead ends and hypotheses as to the exact course of events cannot always be tested (yet!). My investigations have gone further than most (excluding the Central Bureau of Investigation, India, which never could make its findings known to the public due to the quashing of the case by Government order, PM Rao and Home Minister Chavan and the then AP State rulers being devotees of Sai Baba).
However, I was secretly told many utterly damaging details by my closest friend in the movement, a person who was VERY close to Sai Baba - V.K. Narasimhan (deceased) - that the police were forced into doing the executions by blackmail, in which Sai Baba's younger brother (Janakiramiah) played a leading role along with other ashram officials. Before a shocked V.K. Narasimhan, Home Minister Chavan congratulated Janakiramiah on his blackmailing role, to which the latter replied "Dead men tell no tales" and both laughed! I cannot possibly doubt my friend Narasimhan's confidences to me, and I am willing to swear on this to on any holy scripture or in any court. All this was done with (the supposedly omniscient and ompipotent) Sai Baba's passive complicity from where he hid in the garage to which he had fled! He was never questioned! A student (under the age of consent) was in his bedroom at the time and opened the door to the intruders. That boy subsequently disappeared and was never found for questioning by the press or official bodies. What was he there for and why was he spirited away? The entire episode reeks of the blackest crimes, as anyone who has studied the collected documentation by Basava Premanand in the 800+ page book 'Murders in Sai Baba's Bedroom' can read. It took me over two years before I was forced - despite my long and deep engagement in the positive aspects of Sai Baba's movement - to draw the inevitable main conclusion. Sai Baba is not at all what he claims to be.
Then in 2000, the massed evidence of sexual abuses of young men and boys began to emerge because the internet made communication between ex-followers possible as never before. Even then, I ignored it all as slander... but eventually began to investigate, which I have continued to so for 4 years. A summary of my results (excluding those too sensitive to publish) is found at http://home.no.net/anir/Sai/enigma/SaiSex.htm
(Joe Gerald Moreno has certainly NOT read Premanand's book as he even got the title wrong in an e-mail to an activist which was forwarded to me! His criticism of all efforts to investigate further is ill-informed in the extreme and amount to hair-splitting. Enough said.) |
joe108 (joe108)
New member
Username: joe108
Post Number: 3
Registered: 11-2004
Posted From: 67.0.236.163
| | Posted on Saturday, January 15, 2005 - 12:29 am: |
|
Robert Priddy~ you are wrong again. The title of the book is "Murders in Sai Baba's Bedroom". It is correctly worded on my site about Premanand. However, in an email correspondence, I said, "6 Murders in Sai Baba's Bedroom". Am I wrong? I guess I am, if Premanand is wrong too! Look at the title of the book that Premanand (the author of the book) gave at: http://www.indian-skeptic.org/html/bedroom.htm
He says "6 Murders In Sai Baba's Bedrooom" is the title of the book! No wonder everyone is confused about the real title of the book!
Get it right already! And Robert Priddy, why don't you tell everyone how you are plagiarizing my works by stealing my title, description, keywords, metatags and javascripts verbatim!?
Everyone can take a look for themselves:
http://www.vishvarupa.com/Fair-Is-Fair/Ex-Baba.com/robin-bob-robert-priddy-priddles.html
(Message edited by joe108 on January 15, 2005) |
joe108 (joe108)
New member
Username: joe108
Post Number: 4
Registered: 11-2004
Posted From: 4.240.144.13
| | Posted on Wednesday, June 08, 2005 - 1:44 pm: |
|
My site has grown so large, it now has its own domain:
http://www.saisathyasai.com/
This site exposes the lies, deceit and dishonesty of those who are Anti-Sai and discusses various allegations in depth with pro and con arguments. My vishvarupa.com site will be transferred to the new domain and the older links will be removed once the newer domain becomes established.
Consequently, Robert Priddy's info page can be found at:
http://www.saisathyasai.com/baba/Ex-Baba.com/robin-bob-robert-priddy-priddles.html |
priddy (priddy)
New member
Username: priddy
Post Number: 2
Registered: 12-2004
Posted From: 80.111.123.220
| | Posted on Wednesday, July 27, 2005 - 12:22 pm: |
|
Joe 108 proves by his posting that he does not have a copy of Premanand's book, because he is confused even about the title! So he has certainly not read the vital documentation about the murders and therefore nothing he speculates and contorts can be taken seriously.
He has to descend to trying to defame people, not least me, such as in his aggressive web page he boasts about in his posting above.
Further, he has no copyright on meta-tags which are found on many websites free for the taking. It is not 'stealing' to borrow certain tags so as to be represented fairly on Google beside Joe, who claims to believe in free speech and information. This claim of 'theft' is a big point for Joe because he has nothing else substantial to offer to refute the exposé of Sai Baba. Meahwhile, on his website he has stolen many of my texts which are my copyright and are published in my book 'End of the Dream', having totally the warning to request permission, which is posted on my website too at http://home.no.net/anir/Sai/enigma/index.htm. There one will find honest accounts not based on distorting others' views, which is all that Joe ever does. Joe admits he believes that Sai Baba is a sexual abuser (on his FAQ webpage), but he defends Sai Baba on everything he can. So he evidently condones sexual abuse. Is he not completel morally bankrupt. I ask?
Joe demonstrates to the full that he is a nit-picking obsessive guru fanatic who will stoop to mud-slinging, twisting of facts, ignoring all the major documentation and main issues by his biased distortions of what others have written, not even backed up by the slightest investigation.
The deceit and dishonesty is totally on Joe's side - that is, the webmaster of the website he publicises, Gerald Joe Moreno of New Mexico. It can be seen by anyone who is not a brainwashed Sai follower, and even by many of them! |
joe108 (joe108)
New member
Username: joe108
Post Number: 5
Registered: 11-2004
Posted From: 67.0.237.211
| | Posted on Tuesday, August 02, 2005 - 10:33 pm: |
|
Mr. Priddy, I already answered your claim about Premanand's title. If you want to accuse Premanand of the same fault you accuse me of, then go right ahead. Premanand got the title, to his OWN book, wrong three times. I made the mistake once. Now who is the "obsessive nitpicker"? Look in the mirror.
I will duly note you have said absolutely nothing to refute any of my commentaries or articles on my site.
Now if you want to say that the "vital documentation" about the 1993 police shootings has not been made public on your site, go right ahead. I never claimed to have read Premanand's book. I said, very clearly, I read the hundreds of pages that have duplicated from his book on the internet. Now, if the "vital documentation" has not been made public, no wonder your conspiracy theory makes no sense! Thank you for acknowledging the fact that the "vital documenation" has NOT been made public. Now do tell us...what do you base your conspiracy theory on, if not on the "vital documentation"?
It is also apparent you are having trouble reading. I said that you plagiarized my titles, descriptions, keywords, javascripts and meta-tags verbatim. Which you did. Although metatags are not copyright protected, descriptions, titles and domain-linked javascripts are. ALL of which you stole from my site. WHY are you copying MY site information in the first place?
I think my site shows that the only person who is a "nitpicking, obsessive guru fanatic" is you. After all, you are the one who has written HUNDREDS of articles against Sathya Sai Baba. You can't even make up your mind about his powers. You argue that Sathya Sai Baba is a fraud and a lousy magician, then you keep saying that he has genuine paranormal powers, can materialize apports and is psychically sensitive! At least I am consistent.
You can keep whining and sniveling and blaming others for "mud-slinging", "twisting of facts", "ignoring all the major documentation", resorting to "biased distortions", etc., etc., ad nauseam. BUT, you have NOT refuted any of my arguments. You tried once, but your failure has been publicly documented (surely, much to your chagrin):
http://www.saisathyasai.com/baba/Ex-Baba.com/News/may-2005-priddymurders.html
It is abundantly clear that anyone with any semblence of intellectual independence can see your deceit and dishonesty for what it is: Cultish, Secretive, Anti-Sai propagandizing backed up with NO public affidavits; NO court cases filed, first-hand, by alleged victims in India (despite being offered FREE "world class legal resources"); NO evidence for SSB's complicity in the 1993 police shootings (11+ years and counting); NO evidence for distortion, fraud or bribery (umpteen years and counting) and NO new allegations or evidence against SSB in the last 5 years. NO independent verification of alleged data. Nothing!
Keep holding on to your "blame" and "second coming" mentality, Mr. Priddy. That is all you have and all you can argue with.
Index:
http://www.saisathyasai.com/baba/Ex-Baba.com/A-Priddy/robert-priddy-deception.html
While you are at it, Mr Priddy, why don't you explain to everyone why you are putting openly faked signatures on your Ex-Office Bearers page? I thought you verified signatures? Apparently not!
http://www.saisathyasai.com/baba/Ex-Baba.com/fake-name-used.html
(Message edited by joe108 on August 02, 2005)
(Message edited by joe108 on August 08, 2005) |
belong2jesus (belong2jesus)
Junior Member
Username: belong2jesus
Post Number: 35
Registered: 12-2004
Posted From: 59.145.99.10
| | Posted on Monday, August 22, 2005 - 3:48 am: |
|
Sai Baba is of the devil.
He mostly teaches self-exaltation and glorifying self and thinking of self as something than God-centerdness and praising the living God, rather than mortal Sai Baba.
Sai Baba is himself a deception and is devil-possessed. He persuades people by his rubbish grabage philosophy.
Jesus Christ is the only Savior for the entire human race, irrespective of thier religious background.
Read the bible and you will find everything about Jesus was prophesied over 400 years before Jesus was born, by more than 40 prophets. The prophecies are 100% accurate, not just an estimated 80%. The devil has a bit of fore-knowledge too. But God is always 100% true and right.
I pray Sai Baba be stripped of his devilish power in Jesus Name! |
bpittard
New member
Username: bpittard
Post Number: 1
Registered: 4-2007
Posted From: 220.237.245.196
| | Posted on Tuesday, April 10, 2007 - 5:10 am: |
|
My blogsite Call For Media and Government Investigation of Sathya Sai Baba is at:
http://barrypittard.wordpress.com
This blogsite is maintained most days of the week. I, Barry Pittard, an Australian, lectured for two years at one of Sai Baba's foremost colleges, and, since late 1999, I have been involved in putting a case to media and elsewhere to the effect that Sai Baba is arguably the most powerful and contentious guru in India's long history.
Former devotees of Sai Baba come from various cultures and social and educational backgrounds. It is our confidence that proper third party investigation of Sathya Sai Baba and his worldwide Sathya Sai Organization is most needed. |
bpittard
New member
Username: bpittard
Post Number: 2
Registered: 4-2007
Posted From: 220.237.245.196
| | Posted on Tuesday, April 10, 2007 - 5:18 am: |
|
My blogsite Call For Media and Government Investigation of Sathya Sai Baba is at:
http://barrypittard.wordpress.com
This blogsite is maintained most days of the week. I, Barry Pittard, an Australian, lectured for two years at one of Sai Baba's foremost colleges, and, since late 1999, I have been involved in putting a case to media and elsewhere to the effect that Sai Baba is arguably the most powerful and contentious guru in India's long history.
Former devotees of Sai Baba come from various cultures and social and educational backgrounds. It is our confidence that proper third party investigation of Sathya Sai Baba and his worldwide Sathya Sai Organization is most needed. |
joe108
New member
Username: joe108
Post Number: 6
Registered: 11-2004
Posted From: 4.240.213.79
| | Posted on Thursday, September 20, 2007 - 2:48 am: |
|
Barry Pittard (an ex-devotee) has been fully exposed for his smear campaigns against Sathya Sai Baba:
http://www.saisathyasai.com/baba/Ex-Baba.com/A-Pittard/barry-pittard-deception.html
Barry Pittard STILL believes that the Indian Guru DOES possess genuine paranormal powers. See:
http://www.saisathyasai.com/baba/Ex-Baba.com/A-Pittard/z-sai-baba-genuine-paranormal-powers.html
Barry Pittard, a lecturer at Sai Baba's College? Facts:
http://www.saisathyasai.com/baba/Ex-Baba.com/A-Pittard/z-lecturer-whitefield-college.html
A full exposure of Pittard's and other Anti-Sai Activist's lies, deceit and dishonesty can be found at:
http://www.saisathyasai.com/ |
joe108
New member
Username: joe108
Post Number: 7
Registered: 11-2004
Posted From: 4.240.213.79
| | Posted on Thursday, September 20, 2007 - 2:58 am: |
|
Barry Pittard (an ex-devotee) has been fully exposed for his smear campaigns against Sathya Sai Baba:
http://www.saisathyasai.com/baba/Ex-Baba.com/A-Pittard/barry-pittard-deception.html
Barry Pittard STILL believes that the Indian Guru DOES possess genuine paranormal powers. See:
http://www.saisathyasai.com/baba/Ex-Baba.com/A-Pittard/z-sai-baba-genuine-paranormal-powers.html
Barry Pittard, a lecturer at Sai Baba's College? Facts:
http://www.saisathyasai.com/baba/Ex-Baba.com/A-Pittard/z-lecturer-whitefield-college.html
A full exposure of Pittard's and other Anti-Sai Activist's lies, deceit and dishonesty can be found at:
http://www.saisathyasai.com/ |
yourmaster
New member
Username: yourmaster
Post Number: 23
Registered: 9-2005
Posted From: 24.21.104.153
| | Posted on Wednesday, October 10, 2007 - 12:47 am: |
|
sia babba is nothing but a parasite moron. |
|
