    
bro_derrick
Senior Member
Username: bro_derrick
Post Number: 1995
Registered: 9-2005
Posted From: 70.208.111.39
| | Posted on Wednesday, January 09, 2008 - 4:24 pm: | 
|
"Another amazing thing is how some of you complain about NTCC twisting scripture, but you do the same thing when you use the scripture to support your hate & slander..."
"...it appears one is not allowed to have their own perspective and comments without potential backlash. One of the main reasons to "escape" NTCC is to be allowed to be a free thinker..."
"Cyper-space hi-fives of sorts seem to fly (on Factnet) when vitriol (against Davis) is spewed out."
Free to think and say what? That we who are not as 'objective as some' about Davis are indeed 'sometimes': False accusers, haters, slanderers, vitriol-makers, go-to-far, not-move-on-enough, compromisers...? This is perspective and comment??
Well: With 'perspective & comment' like that, who needs loyalist bullets?
The one most prominent tool of mind-control is the guilt-trips of men upon others posed as the judgment of God: Ergo, the total rejection of such tactics is automatic on Factnet, whether made by loyalist or 'more balanced' exers.
"Some appear to be pretty high minded when it comes to spilling one's guts about this org. It would be one thing to just pass it on by, but somehow they feel compelled to take a few shots at those who do feel compelled to issue a warning."
"He thinks he has something to teach the critics... He has no idea what he is saying."
Why is it that loyalists and 'objective free-thinking' exers CONSISTENTLY fail to understand this? That it is not for mere abstinence from, nor even real disagreement with our charges, but rather it is to THEN go on and ACCUSE such--Shall I say 'freedom-fighters'?--with the same guilt-ridden ammo as Davis & Denis employ in their own domains?
Turning and attacking US First (even from the middle) with loyalist-flack is NOT simple disagreement, and far from absent abstinence (!)
And so, if we must thus shoot lower in our sights to pay-back double (Rev 18:6) to the most prominent tactic of unwarranted and UNGODLY guilt-tripping of the sheep, that is thrown at us from the far side and middle-ground, then why cry, complain, and cry foul about it??
You disagree. Fine. Abstain. Fine. Vic and I have done both with each other: But NEVER have either of us turned and fired at the other as Slanderers, False Accusers, losers, vitriolers, blasphemers, etc... epsecially not of Davis in the defence of Davis (!)
Such trash ON FACTNET is made to be Burned, Discarded, and Buried deep back in Satan's seat where it came from:
'And I heard a loud voice saying in heaven, Now is come salvation, and strength, and the kingdom of our God, and the power of his Christ: for the accuser of our brethren is cast down, which accused them before our God day and night.' (Rev 12:10)
You want to ACCUSE of slander, over-the-top? Prove it. Which is NOT just personal feeling, biased generalization, and convenient Scripture.
'Desiring to be teachers of the law; understanding neither what they say, nor whereof they affirm.' (1 Tim 1:7) |