| Author |
Message |
   
pilgrim Advanced Member Username: pilgrim
Post Number: 648 Registered: 9-2005 Posted From: 195.93.21.42
| | Posted on Monday, November 12, 2007 - 6:20 am: |
|
I have recently come across the following information in the following links, http://www.remnantofgod.org/pope1.htm http://www.reformation.org/simon_peter_versus_simon_magus.html Which lead me to ask the following question, Was Simon the Sorcerer from Act 8: 9-24 the real first pope? |
   
arron Senior Member Username: arron
Post Number: 3712 Registered: 11-2004 Posted From: 68.119.39.156
| | Posted on Monday, November 12, 2007 - 10:31 am: |
|
I KNOW ONE THING PETER WAS NOT THE FIRST POPE THAT WAS A LATER CATHOLIC FALE DOCTRINE |
   
termin8d Advanced Member Username: termin8d
Post Number: 693 Registered: 7-2005 Posted From: 60.234.129.189
| | Posted on Monday, November 12, 2007 - 2:06 pm: |
|
Simon the Sorceror was not the first pope. The papacy was not even recognized as a doctrine by the early church. It slowly developed over time and for political reasons centuries later. |