| Author |
Message |
   
the_apostolic_truth_ministries Member Username: the_apostolic_truth_ministries
Post Number: 87 Registered: 10-2005 Posted From: 12.208.12.98
| | Posted on Friday, May 18, 2007 - 9:13 am: |
|
Finis Jennings Dake, author of the pentecostal Bible. Mr. Finis Jennings Dake is the author of the pentecostal Bible. <sidebar> Please do not buy a Dake’s Bible at retail cost. Dake’s are available as distressed merchandise in most bookstores. If not, look at the nearest flea market.<sidebar> I gave five bucks for my Dake’s as distressed merchandise being sold in a flea market in Mobile, Alabama one Saturday morning. The Bible was still in the box and the box still in shrink wrap. It is the leather addition valued in the neighborhood of $100.00. When I removed his Bible from the box, I found a note from Mr. Dake. The card claimed Mr. Dake had attended Bible school for one year before discovering he knew more than the teachers. Then Dake goes on to explain that he had never read two verses of scripture in his life. All his writings, according to Dake, are inspired by the Holy Ghost. Inspiration of the Holy Ghost is required by pentecostalism to validate one’s claims. If you go to the Dake Family Publishing website, you will find a picture of Dake sitting in a hardware store window reciting the New Testament under inspiration of the Holy Ghost. That session further qualified Dake to write the pentecostal Bible. After writing the Old Testament portion of his Bible and selling it to a publisher, Mr. Dake was convicted of taking a sixteen-year-old girl across state lines for immortal purposes. Mr. Dake told his church he was witnessing to a wretched little sinner. He told the judge they were having quote, unquote “nude petting parties.” I think they call that “laying on of hands!” Either way, Mr. Dake’s scandal rendered him fully qualified to write the pentecostal Bible. The Bible begins by explaining there are millions, perhaps billions of years between Genesis chapter 1, verse 1 and Genesis chapter 1, verse 2. The “Gap Theory,” as it is called, was invented in the last half of the nineteenth century to appease the old earth geologist and the new earth creationist. Those same geologist rejected the theory before the ink dried on the paper. Today pentecostalism, and to a lesser extent the Roman church, are the only ones who promote the “Gap Theory.” <sidebar> Yes, Dr. Scofield did mention the “Gap Theory” in his Bible. Fortunately, Dr. Scofield had enough sense to drop the subject. <sidebar>. Mr. Dake goes on to describe millions perhaps billions of years of sin, death and destruction before Adam. Mr. Dake places God on top of this filth, proclaiming “It is good!” His description of pre-Adamic sin is easily disproved with the Bible. St. Paul clearly tells us “sin enter the world with one man, Adam.” Finis took the “Gap Theory” to a whole new level, above and beyond anything any man ever envisioned. While in prison, Mr. Dake wrote the New Testament portion of his Bible. After his release, Mr. Dake attempted to sell his completed Bible to the publisher. Unfortunately for Mr. Dake, the publisher returned the Old Testament portion with a clear “No thank you.” Mr. Dake was unable to locate a publisher for his Bible due to the gross errors it contains. Dake was force to self-publish the pentecostal Bible. continued |
   
the_apostolic_truth_ministries Member Username: the_apostolic_truth_ministries
Post Number: 88 Registered: 10-2005 Posted From: 12.208.12.98
| | Posted on Friday, May 18, 2007 - 9:14 am: |
|
During the late nineties, Dr. Fredrick K. C. Price gave a three year study entitled “Racism in the pentecostal Church.” The main source Dr. Price cited was the Dake’s Bible. Dr. Price exposed the many racial slurs Mr. Dake included in his Bible. <sidebar> If you have an early nineties or earlier, Dake’s, it is worth a fortune to white supremacist. <sidebar>. Dake Family Publishing agreed to allow Dr. Leon Bible to rewrite Dake’s and remove the racial slurs it did not contain. The newer Dake’s, I have seen, do not mention the revision. Errors found in Dake’s: 1. Dake is the only author to find support for pentecostalism in the Bible. 2. The Gap Theory. 3. Nine part Trinity. 4. Multiple racial slurs. 5. False claim of pre-Adamic sin. 6. False understanding of disease, sickness, illness and even death. Sources: 1. Dake’s Annotated Bible. 2. Dake’s Plan for Man. 3. Dr. Fredrick K. C. Price. 4. Dr. Leon Bible interview. |
   
arron Member Username: arron
Post Number: 75 Registered: 11-2004 Posted From: 68.119.34.187
| | Posted on Friday, May 18, 2007 - 10:07 am: |
|
the schofield bible from which when i attended the baptist which i was saved in supported the gap theroy the rapture the trinity the original sin and also that healing was in the atonement |
   
arron Member Username: arron
Post Number: 76 Registered: 11-2004 Posted From: 68.119.34.187
| | Posted on Friday, May 18, 2007 - 10:08 am: |
|
and besides i DONT LISTEN to fred price |
   
mcmstaff78 Member Username: mcmstaff78
Post Number: 59 Registered: 7-2006 Posted From: 24.99.130.74
| | Posted on Friday, May 18, 2007 - 10:18 am: |
|
Fully agree with TATM about Dakes. I was given one many years ago along with his "God's Plan for Man". The perfect example of ignorance gone to seed. The scriptures plainly say Knowing this first, that no prophecy of the scripture is of any private interpretation. (2 Peter 1:20) People following Dake's, Scofield's, Ryrie's, or a host of other "study" bibles should ponder the meaning of 2 Peter. |
   
the_apostolic_truth_ministries Member Username: the_apostolic_truth_ministries
Post Number: 94 Registered: 10-2005 Posted From: 12.208.12.98
| | Posted on Friday, May 18, 2007 - 3:38 pm: |
|
Mr. MCMSTAFF78 Is there any chance 2 Peter 1:20 applies to the Roman church? |
   
mcmstaff78 Member Username: mcmstaff78
Post Number: 63 Registered: 7-2006 Posted From: 24.99.130.74
| | Posted on Friday, May 18, 2007 - 5:13 pm: |
|
Define what you mean by "Roman church". |
   
the_apostolic_truth_ministries Member Username: the_apostolic_truth_ministries
Post Number: 96 Registered: 10-2005 Posted From: 12.208.12.98
| | Posted on Friday, May 18, 2007 - 5:51 pm: |
|
Mr. MCMSTAFF&*: You know the drill. I am talking about your blatant double standards. |
   
the_apostolic_truth_ministries Member Username: the_apostolic_truth_ministries
Post Number: 97 Registered: 10-2005 Posted From: 12.208.12.98
| | Posted on Friday, May 18, 2007 - 5:53 pm: |
|
Man did I get a capitalizational error or what? That should be addressed to Mr. MCMSTAFF78. |
   
mcmstaff78 Member Username: mcmstaff78
Post Number: 68 Registered: 7-2006 Posted From: 24.99.130.74
| | Posted on Friday, May 18, 2007 - 7:03 pm: |
|
What "double standard" would that be? By "Roman church" I would assume you mean those who term themselves "Roman Catholic". I am not "Roman Catholic". However, 2 Peter 1:20 applies to every individual, including you. |
   
the_apostolic_truth_ministries Member Username: the_apostolic_truth_ministries
Post Number: 100 Registered: 10-2005 Posted From: 12.208.12.98
| | Posted on Saturday, May 19, 2007 - 7:25 am: |
|
Mr. MCMSTAFF78: I do not need a private interpretation to disprove Roman doctrine. I simply quote scripture word for word. |
   
arron Member Username: arron
Post Number: 92 Registered: 11-2004 Posted From: 68.119.34.187
| | Posted on Saturday, May 19, 2007 - 9:27 am: |
|
well not it is you isnt it. now going by a different name tatm. you are nothing in your doctrines. you are just against pentecostal caue one of your people were "hurt" by one |
   
mcmstaff78 Member Username: mcmstaff78
Post Number: 70 Registered: 7-2006 Posted From: 24.99.130.74
| | Posted on Saturday, May 19, 2007 - 10:41 am: |
|
TATM, who says? Your statement is inherently self-contradicting. Again, what does the "Roman church" have to do with anything? |
   
mcmstaff78 Member Username: mcmstaff78
Post Number: 71 Registered: 7-2006 Posted From: 24.99.130.74
| | Posted on Saturday, May 19, 2007 - 10:42 am: |
|
BTW, TATM, I'm still waiting for you to answer my simple questions. |
   
arron Intermediate Member Username: arron
Post Number: 102 Registered: 11-2004 Posted From: 68.119.34.187
| | Posted on Saturday, May 19, 2007 - 11:21 am: |
|
i have abad use a dakes bible althought it has been a while since i consulted it . i do use kjv .and only the kjv dakes ahs some good points i do not agree with all of them but on the pentecostl issue yes for i am pentecostal i dont agree with a lot of the other commenteries either |
   
the_apostolic_truth_ministries Intermediate Member Username: the_apostolic_truth_ministries
Post Number: 103 Registered: 10-2005 Posted From: 12.208.12.98
| | Posted on Saturday, May 19, 2007 - 12:30 pm: |
|
Mr. MCMSTAFF78: Quoting: "TATM, who says?" End quote. http://www.factnet.org/discus/messages/3/29999.html?1175698634 |
   
mcmstaff78 Member Username: mcmstaff78
Post Number: 77 Registered: 7-2006 Posted From: 24.99.130.74
| | Posted on Sunday, May 20, 2007 - 3:42 pm: |
|
You quote yourself, it is both question begging and irrelevant. I wonder, is it even possible for you to give a straight answer? How about just answering my questions? Present the details of your "calling" and give us the basis on which you can determine just what god it was who did the "calling". |