| Author | Message | ||
     gatordave Member Username: gatordave Post Number: 93 Registered: 11-2004 Posted From: 24.141.178.119 |
Self Explainatory http://www.pyramidschemealert.org/PSAMain/news/UsanaPyramidScheme.html dave www.crimebustersnow.com 905-963-3389 24/7 We return calls toll free in North America and countries world-wide. | ||
| gatordave Member Username: gatordave Post Number: 94 Registered: 11-2004 Posted From: 24.141.178.119 |
AGAIN, WHAT IS CANADA DOING ABOUT THESE OBVIOUS MONEY_LAUNDERING PYRAMID FRAUDS??? dave www.crimebustersnow.com 905-963-3389 24/7 We return calls toll free in North America and countries world-wide. | ||
| terrihamel New member Username: terrihamel Post Number: 2 Registered: 10-2007 Posted From: 76.171.20.84 |
Dave, there is another side to this story. Are you aware that the guy launching this attack is a convicted felon? Here's a post by Len Clements: Here's the latest episode of the Fraud Discovery Institute vs. Usana soap opera. Yes, we've got all the classic elements: Deceit, illicit affairs, passion, anger, mistaken identities, shocking revelations, overacting - everything but the sex. Let's call it Guiding Fright, or All My Distributors, or As the Downline Turns. Or how about Days of Our Jives? Or maybe the Young and Should Pester Less? Eh, or maybe not. Anyway, Barry Minkow (founder of the FDI), who produced the original Usana exposé in question, has offered another response to my response to his response to my response to his Usana report. Try to keep up. If you need help, here's a recap: Here's my original Rebuttal Report: http://www.marketwaveinc.com/FDI-Rebuttal-R1.pdf Here's Minkow's first response: http://www.frauddiscovery.net/ClementsResponse.pdf You can read my response to his response here: http://www.marketwaveinc.com/FDI-Rebuttal-R2.pdf Now here is his latest response, such as it is: http://www.frauddiscovery.net/RebuttalAddendum.pdf And here is my latest counter-response: http://www.marketwaveinc.com/FDI-Rebuttal-R3.pdf I have challenged Mr. Minkow to provide clear and specific answers to the several direct questions I have posed to him in my previous two responses. If he again chooses not to respond, then I will bow out of this dialogue and the last word will be his. I choose not to debate with someone who refuses to actively and fairly participate in the process. Mr. Minkow can evade my questions from afar, under these conditions, but he won't be able to from the stand, under oath. Len Clements MarketWave, Inc. |
